Consumers' Preferences for Wine Attributes: A Best-Worst Scaling Analysis

被引:32
|
作者
Stanco, Marcello [1 ]
Lerro, Marco [1 ]
Marotta, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sannio, Dept Law Econ Management & Quantitat Methods, I-82100 Benevento, Italy
关键词
B-W analysis; Italian consumers; tradition; sustainability; innovation; wine attributes; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUSTAINABLE WINE; FOOD; PERCEPTIONS; CHOICE; PRODUCT;
D O I
10.3390/su12072819
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The current paper aims to explore consumers' preferences for wine attributes related to tradition, sustainability, and innovation. A total of 419 regular wine consumers participated in an online survey that took place in Italy. Consumers' preferences were assessed through a Best-Worst experiment with 11 wine attributes drawn from the literature. The result shows that the wine attributes, more important for consumers, are mainly related to tradition and sustainability. More specifically, the most important attributes for consumers when purchasing wine are "geographical indications", "grape variety", "sustainable certification", "vintage", and "price". By contrast, the innovative wine attributes investigated were ranked among the least important ones, namely "canned wine", "alcohol-free wine", and "vegan wine". The study findings offer several implications for wineries and marketers involved in the wine sector. They specifically provide suggestions on the wine attribute wineries should focus on to meet the current consumers' preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview
    Axel C. Mühlbacher
    Anika Kaczynski
    Peter Zweifel
    F. Reed Johnson
    [J]. Health Economics Review, 6
  • [42] Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Kaczynski, Anika
    Zweifel, Peter
    Johnson, F. Reed
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2016, 6 : 1 - 14
  • [43] Using best-worst scaling to reveal preferences for retrofitting raingardens in suburban streets
    Dobbie, Meredith F.
    Farrelly, Megan A.
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2022, 74
  • [44] Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Kaambwa, Billingsley
    Hutchinson, Claire
    Lancsar, Emily
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (03): : 307 - 315
  • [45] Parental preferences for vesicoureteral reflux treatment: Profile case best-worst scaling
    Dionise, Zachary R.
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Garcia-Roig, Michael L.
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    Scales, Charles D., Jr.
    Wiener, John S.
    Purves, J. Todd
    Routh, Jonathan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (01) : 86.e1 - 86.e9
  • [46] Patient Preferences for Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A Best-Worst Scaling Survey
    Howell, Martin
    Wong, Germaine
    Rose, John
    Tong, Allison
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Howard, Kirsten
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (11) : 2765 - 2773
  • [47] Assessing Australian consumer preferences for fresh pork meat attributes: A best-worst approach on 46 attributes
    Duong, Chien
    Sung, Billy
    Lee, Sean
    Easton, Julia
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2022, 193
  • [48] Caregiver Preferences for Emerging Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Treatments: A Comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Conjoint Analysis
    Hollin, Ilene L.
    Peay, Holly L.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (01): : 19 - 27
  • [49] Caregiver Preferences for Emerging Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Treatments: A Comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Conjoint Analysis
    Ilene L. Hollin
    Holly L. Peay
    John F. P. Bridges
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2015, 8 : 19 - 27
  • [50] Public preferences regarding adoption of personal genomic testing based on best-worst scaling
    Jeong, Gicheol
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (04) : 358 - 364