Mathematics Curriculum Effects on Student Achievement in California

被引:24
|
作者
Koedel, Cory [1 ]
Li, Diyi [2 ]
Polikoff, Morgan S. [3 ]
Hardaway, Tenice [4 ]
Wrabel, Stephani L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Econ & Publ Policy, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Econ, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Educ, Rossier Sch Educ, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Rossier Sch Educ, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90406 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
curriculum; econometric analysis; economics of education; educational policy; mathematics education; quasiex-perimental analysis;
D O I
10.1177/2332858417690511
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We estimate relative achievement effects of the four most commonly adopted elementary mathematics textbooks in the fall of 2008 and fall of 2009 in California. Our findings indicate that one book, Houghton Mifflin's California Math, is more effective than the other three, raising student achievement by 0.05 to 0.08 student-level standard deviations of the Grade 3 state standardized math test. We also estimate positive effects of California Math relative to the other textbooks in higher elementary grades. The differential effect of California Math is educationally meaningful, particularly given that it is a schoolwide effect and can be had at what is effectively zero marginal cost.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条