Impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cattle producers' reports of milking labour management, milk production and milk quality

被引:1
|
作者
Tse, C. [1 ]
Barkema, H. W. [1 ]
DeVries, T. J. [2 ]
Rushen, J. [3 ]
Pajor, E. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Prod Anim Hlth, 3330 Hosp Dr, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim Biosci, 50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
robotic milking; adoption; transition; precision dairying; dairy herd improvement programme; ROBOTIC MILKING; COWS; HEALTH; FARMS; FREQUENCY; PATTERNS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731118000654
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Automatic milking systems (AMS), or milking robots, are becoming widely accepted as a milking technology that reduces labour and increases milk yield. However, reported amount of labour saved, changes in milk yield, and milk quality when transitioning to AMS vary widely. The purpose of this study was to document the impact of adopting AMS on farms with regards to reported changes in milking labour management, milk production, milk quality, and participation in dairy herd improvement (DHI) programmes. A survey was conducted across Canada over the phone, online, and in-person. In total, 530 AMS farms were contacted between May 2014 and the end of June 2015. A total of 217 AMS producers participated in the General Survey (Part 1), resulting in a 41% response rate, and 69 of the respondents completed the more detailed follow-up questions (Part 2). On average, after adopting AMS, the number of employees (full- and part-time non-family labour combined) decreased from 2.5 to 2.0, whereas time devoted to milking-related activities decreased by 62% (from 5.2 to 2.0 h/day). Median milking frequency was 3.0 milkings/day and robots were occupied on average 77% of the day. Producers went to fetch cows a median of 2 times/day, with a median of 3 fetch cows or 4% of the herd per robot/day. Farms had a median of 2.5 failed or incomplete milkings/robot per day. Producers reported an increase in milk yield, but little effect on milk quality. Mean milk yield on AMS farms was 32.6 kg/cow day. Median bulk tank somatic cell count was 180 000 cells/mt. Median milk fat on AMS farms was 40% and median milk protein was 3.3%. At the time of the survey, 67% of producers were current participants of a DHI programme. Half of the producers who were not DHI participants had stopped participation after adopting AMS. Overall, this study characterized impacts of adopting AMS and may be a useful guide for making this transition.
引用
收藏
页码:2649 / 2656
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MILKING TECHNOLOGY INFLUENCE ON DAIRY COW MILK PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY
    Petrovska, Solvita
    Jonkus, Daina
    13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, : 89 - 93
  • [42] Monitoring milk quality, milking management and udder health
    Ruegg, P. L.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2014, 22 : 169 - 175
  • [43] Reduced milking frequency: Milk production and management implications
    Stelwagen, K.
    Phyn, C. V. C.
    Davis, S. R.
    Guinard-Flament, J.
    Pomies, D.
    Roche, J. R.
    Kay, J. K.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (06) : 3401 - 3413
  • [44] Relationship between milk progesterone profiles and genetic merit for milk production, milking frequency, and feeding regimen in dairy cattle
    Windig, J. J.
    Beerda, B.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (07) : 2874 - 2884
  • [45] Milk quality and automatic milking: effects of free fatty acids
    Slaghuis, BA
    Bos, K
    de Jong, O
    de Koning, K
    INDICATORS OF MILK AND BEEF QUALITY, 2005, (112): : 351 - 358
  • [46] The effects of the milking frequency and milk production levels on milk partitioning in Tinerfena dairy goats
    Capote, J.
    Castro, N.
    Caja, G.
    Fernandez, G.
    Morales-delaNuez
    Argueello, A.
    MILCHWISSENSCHAFT-MILK SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 64 (03): : 239 - 241
  • [47] Milk cortisol concentration in automatic milking systems compared with auto-tandem milking parlors
    Gygax, L.
    Neuffer, I.
    Kaufmann, C.
    Hauser, R.
    Wechsler, B.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2006, 89 (09) : 3447 - 3454
  • [48] Introduction of automatic milking system in Finland:: effect on milk quality
    Salovuo, H
    Ronkainen, P
    Heino, A
    Suokannas, A
    Ryhänen, EL
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (04) : 346 - 353
  • [49] Milk quality and automatic milking: effects of teat and system cleaning
    Slaghuis, BA
    Verstappen, JAM
    Ferwerda, RT
    Bos, CH
    Schuiling, HJ
    INDICATORS OF MILK AND BEEF QUALITY, 2005, (112): : 359 - 364
  • [50] Homogeneity density scores of quarter milk in automatic milking systems
    Sandgren, C. Hallen
    Anglart, D.
    Klaas, I. C.
    Ronnegard, L.
    Emanuelson, U.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (09) : 10121 - 10130