A theoretical and numerical investigation of a family of immersed finite element methods

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Yongxing [1 ]
Jimack, Peter K. [1 ]
Walkley, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Comp, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Fluid structure; Finite element; Fictitious domain; Immersed finite element; One field; Monolithic scheme; Eulerian formulation; FICTITIOUS DOMAIN APPROACH; MOVING RIGID BODIES; BOUNDARY METHOD; SOLVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102754
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In this article we consider the widely used immersed finite element method (IFEM), in both explicit and implicit form, and its relationship to our more recent one-field fictitious domain method (FDM). We review and extend the formulation of these methods, based upon an operator splitting scheme, in order to demonstrate that both the explicit IFEM and the one-field FDM can be regarded as particular linearizations of the fully implicit IFEM. However, the one-field FDM can be shown to be more robust than the explicit IFEM and can simulate a wider range of solid parameters with a relatively large time step. In addition, it can produce results almost identical to the implicit IFEM but without iteration inside each time step. We study the effect on these methods of variations in viscosity and density of fluid and solid materials. The advantages of the one-field FDM within the IFEM framework are illustrated through a selection of parameter sets for two benchmark cases. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Residual-Based a Posteriori Error Estimation for Immersed Finite Element Methods
    He, Cuiyu
    Zhang, Xu
    JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2019, 81 (03) : 2051 - 2079
  • [42] Immersed electrokinetic finite element method
    Liu, Yaling
    Liu, Wing Kam
    Belytschko, Ted
    Patankar, Neelesh
    To, Albert C.
    Kopacz, Adrian
    Chung, Jae-Hyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 71 (04) : 379 - 405
  • [43] The immersed molecular finite element method
    Kopacz, Adrian M.
    Patankar, Neelesh A.
    Liu, Wing K.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 233 : 28 - 39
  • [44] A NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF THE FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
    RINKER, EA
    SPRINGMAN, RA
    LITTLE, RR
    OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1985, 85 (02) : 82 - 82
  • [45] A numerical comparison of finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation
    Oberai, AA
    Pinsky, PM
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ACOUSTICS, 2000, 8 (01) : 211 - 221
  • [46] Nonconforming finite element methods without numerical locking
    Capatina-Papaghiuc, D
    Thomas, JM
    NUMERISCHE MATHEMATIK, 1998, 81 (02) : 163 - 186
  • [47] On some mixed finite element methods with numerical integration
    Micheletti, S
    Sacco, R
    Saleri, F
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2001, 23 (01): : 245 - 270
  • [48] Numerical simulation of aneurysms with Finite Element and Meshless Methods
    Silva, J. L.
    Belinha, J.
    Neves, J. M. P. R.
    Vilaca, I. R. S. B. S.
    Natal Jorge, R. M.
    2019 6TH IEEE PORTUGUESE MEETING IN BIOENGINEERING (ENBENG), 2019,
  • [49] On the stability of a family of finite element methods for hyperbolic problems
    Richter, GR
    MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 2002, 71 (238) : 527 - 535
  • [50] Reliability of finite element methods for the numerical computation of waves
    Univ of Maryland at College Park, College Park, United States
    Adv Eng Software, 7 (417-424):