Smart pump user interface evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Viviani, C. A. B. [1 ]
Calil, S. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, FEEC, DEB, Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Interface; medical devices; smart pumps; compatibility;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_367
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
there are at least 73 infusion pump manufacturers registered with the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA). Many events reported by the FDA occurred due to usability problems of medical devices, which are often related to lack of consistency in the interface. This may induce the user to error and consequently the occurrence of problems during the device operation. To minimize such events, it is required a careful evaluation of the interface device and also its standardization. Infusion pumps are always present in ECRI's reports as one of the devices that have the highest probability of risk to the patient. The objective of this study is to verify the interfaces consistency of four infusion pumps developed by leading manufacturer in world market. The methodology is structured in two stages. The first stage referred to the development of an appropriate set of criteria for comparing the interfaces of the smart infusion pumps. In the second stage, it was applied the developed criteria to the interfaces using the four pumps as a practical study Evaluation results showed that there is no standardization for designing medical devices of the same type and cathegory; in this case study the smart pumps. It also suggested that each manufacturer designs a device considering only aesthetic issues and does not maintain any consistency with other manufacturers and even with other models or different version devices. This preliminary study provides us with evidence that this lack of consistency between the interfaces of these devices can lead to usability problems, and can lead untrained users to error. Additional studies are needed to further investigation and thereby demonstrate qualitatively results.
引用
收藏
页码:1512 / 1514
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AI in User Interface Design and Evaluation
    Grigera, Julian
    Espada, Jordan Pascual
    Rossi, Gustavo
    IT PROFESSIONAL, 2023, 25 (02) : 20 - 22
  • [22] Evaluation of user interface transcoding systems
    Menkhaus, G
    Fischmeister, S
    7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL V, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING: I, 2003, : 527 - 532
  • [23] Evaluation Model of Voice User Interface
    Wang, Tianshu
    Luo, Ling
    Zhang, Xin
    ADVANCES IN USABILITY, USER EXPERIENCE, WEARABLE AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, AHFE 2021, 2021, 275 : 894 - 899
  • [24] Widgets Dedicated to User Interface Evaluation
    Charfi, Selem
    Trabelsi, Abdelwaheb
    Ezzedine, Houcine
    Kolski, Christophe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2014, 30 (05) : 408 - 421
  • [25] Development of a Simplified Insulin Pump Interface for Improved User Interaction
    Harper, Andy
    Wilson, Wendell
    Choi, Young Mi
    ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN, AHFE 2021, 2021, 260 : 184 - 191
  • [26] Optimization of User Interface Consistency Design by User Acceptability Evaluation
    Okamoto, Teppei
    Kashiwazaki, Naoya
    Kambe, Hidetoshi
    Koizumi, Hisao
    IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, 2021, 141 (11): : 1185 - 1196
  • [27] User evaluation of a graphical user interface for biomedical literature search
    Wiesman, F
    MEDICAL INFORMATICS EUROPE '97: PARTS A & B, 1997, 43 : 796 - 800
  • [28] Bayesian user modeling: evaluation metrics of an adaptive user interface
    Rim, Rebai
    Amin, Maalej Mohamed
    Adel, Mahfoudhi
    Mohamed, Abid
    NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION (ICMV 2016), 2017, 10341
  • [29] Evaluation of user interaction with daylighting simulation in a tangible user interface
    Nasman, Joshua
    Cutler, Barbara
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 36 : 117 - 127
  • [30] An Event Detection Framework Supported by a Smart Graphical User Interface
    Persia, Fabio
    Helmer, Sven
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION (IEEE IRI), 2016, : 490 - 495