Techno-economic analyis of battery storage for peak shaving and frequency containment reserve

被引:2
|
作者
Ahcin, Peter [1 ]
Berg, Kjersti [1 ]
Petersen, Idar [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Energy Res, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Batteries; frequency containment reserve; solar energy; techno-economic analysis;
D O I
10.1109/eem.2019.8916380
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
When does large scale battery storage become economically feasible? To answer this question and put a value on the different services battery storage can provide, we performed techno-economic analyses on the use of large-scale battery storage in Norwegian electricity distribution systems. In the first use case we looked at the feasibility of batteries for peak load shaving and thereby network charge reduction under the power based tariff structure. In the second use case, battery storage was used to reduce both peak load and peak infeed in order to comply with the 100 kW max feed-in rule that is part of the Norwegian prosumer regulation, the "Plusskundeordning". Both of these applications are far from economical at current prices. The third use case was about battery storage used to provide balancing power. This seems to be the most feasible application at the moment. We performed sensitivity analyses under different balancing prices, grid charges, battery degradation levels, battery rest value and capital costs, to identify where battery storage becomes profitable in the Norwegian market. We reference the description of new regulations, tariffs structures, the battery degradation model, the methodology used for the economic evaluation and the controller models for all use cases. The study was performed in the project IntegER.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Techno-Economic Comparison of Stationary Storage and Battery-Electric Buses for Mitigating Solar Intermittency
    Ahmed, Arif
    Massier, Tobias
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (02)
  • [42] Industrial peak shaving with battery storage using a probabilistic forecasting approach: Economic evaluation of risk attitude
    Henni, Sarah
    Becker, Jonas
    Staudt, Philipp
    vom Scheidt, Frederik
    Weinhardt, Christof
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 327
  • [43] Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage System in Commercial Buildings Utilizing Techno-economic Analysis
    Ashabi, A.
    Peiravi, M. M.
    Nikpendar, P.
    Nasab, S. Salehi
    Jaryani, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2022, 35 (08): : 1662 - 1673
  • [44] Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage System in Commercial Buildings Utilizing Techno-economic Analysis
    Ashabi A.
    Peiravi M.M.
    Nikpendar P.
    Nasab S.S.
    Jaryani F.
    International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, 2022, 35 (08): : 1662 - 1673
  • [45] Techno-economic comparison of cooling storage and battery for electricity flexibility at long and short timescales in buildings
    Chen, Qi
    Kuang, Zhonghong
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Tao
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 289
  • [46] Techno-Economic and Sizing Analysis of Battery Energy Storage System for Behind-the-Meter Application
    Tsai, Chih-Ta
    Ocampo, Erica M.
    Beza, Teketay Mulu
    Kuo, Cheng-Chien
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 203734 - 203746
  • [47] Techno-economic assessment of battery storage and Power-to-Gas: A whole-system approach
    Ameli, Hossein
    Qadrdan, Meysam
    Strbac, Goran
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 : 841 - 848
  • [48] Techno-economic analysis of a modular thermochemical battery for electricity storage based on calcium-looping
    Ortiz, C.
    Garcia-Luna, S.
    Carro, A.
    Carvajal, E.
    Chacartegui, R.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 367
  • [49] Techno-economic comparison of diabatic CAES with artificial air reservoir and battery energy storage systems
    Salvini, Coriolano
    Giovannelli, Ambra
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 601 - 607
  • [50] Impact of policy incentives on the promotion of integrated PV and battery storage systems: a techno-economic assessment
    Nousdilis, Angelos I.
    Kryonidis, Georgios C.
    Kontis, Eleftherios O.
    Barzegkar-Ntovom, Georgios A.
    Panapakidis, Ioannis P.
    Christoforidis, Georgios C.
    Papagiannis, Grigoris K.
    IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2020, 14 (07) : 1174 - 1183