The Role of Construal Alignment in Enterprise Risk Management

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xin [1 ]
Wong-On-Wing, Bernard [2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Tacoma, WA 98447 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Carson Coll Business, Dept Accounting, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
enterprise risk management; risk management philosophy; key risk indicators; construal level theory; LEVEL THEORY; INFORMATION; QUANTIFICATION; IMPACT; FIT; GOVERNANCE; PERSUASION; MATURITY; DISTANCE; DECISION;
D O I
10.2308/ISYS-2020-003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
According to the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2017), two important elements of an organization's enterprise risk management (ERM) framework are its risk management philosophy, and its risk appetite and tolerance. Based on Construal Level Theory (CLT), we posit that the effectiveness of ERM depends on the extent of alignment (non-fit or fit) between mental representations (high versus low construal) of those two ERM elements. We test our hypothesis across two risk cases: safety and confidentiality. Results of our experiment suggest that employees are more proactive when there is a construal fit between the emphasis placed on a firm's risk management philosophy and its expression of the key risk indicators (KRIs). This benefit is observed in the confidentiality case, but not in the safety case. Implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 52
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT IN AGRICULTURE
    Sturcova, Jana
    [J]. HRADECKE EKONOMICKE DNY 2012, PT I, 2012, : 292 - 296
  • [22] Enterprise Level IT Risk Management
    Azizi, Nadhirah
    Hashim, Khairuddin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED COMPUTER SCIENCE (ACS'08): RECENT ADVANCES ON APPLIED COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2008, : 401 - +
  • [23] Active enterprise risk, management
    Varcholová, T
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2003, 51 (08): : 997 - 1010
  • [24] Financial Enterprise Risk Management
    Kelliher, Patrick
    [J]. ANNALS OF ACTUARIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 7 (01) : 164 - 166
  • [25] Optimized enterprise risk management
    Abrams, C.
    von Kaenel, J.
    Mueller, S.
    Pfitzmann, B.
    Ruschka-Taylor, S.
    [J]. IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2007, 46 (02) : 219 - 234
  • [26] Enterprise risk management time
    Engle, Paul
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER, 2009, 41 (05): : 20 - 20
  • [27] THE VALUE OF ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
    Hoyt, Robert E.
    Liebenberg, Andre P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2011, 78 (04) : 795 - 822
  • [28] Enterprise Risk Management Perspective
    Yilmaz, Ayse Kucuk
    Karakoc, T. Hikmet
    [J]. GLOBAL WARMING: ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, 2010, : 423 - 437
  • [29] Knowledge Management in Support of Enterprise Risk Management
    Rodriguez, Eduardo
    Edwards, John S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 10 (02) : 43 - 61
  • [30] Enterprise risk management: Coping with model risk
    Wu, De Heng Dash
    Olson, David L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2008, : 1 - 13