Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin

被引:5
|
作者
Ahmed, Shimaa [1 ,2 ]
Kamal, Shereen M. [3 ,4 ]
Salah, Tareq [5 ]
Sedik, Mayada Fawzy [6 ]
Youssief, Ayatallah A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Radiat Oncol, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Nucl Med Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Intens Care Unit, Anesthesia, Assiut, Egypt
[4] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Pain Management Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[5] Assiut Univ, Assiut Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Clin Oncol & Nucl Med Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[6] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Med Oncol & Hematol Malignancies Dept, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
Concurrent capecitabine; Palliative radiotherapy; Pain score; Breast cancer; Bone metastases; RADIATION-THERAPY; METAANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; TRIALS; SINGLE; CHEMORADIATION; FRACTIONATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; PALLIATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively. Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The incidence of consultation for palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis in a single cancer center
    Abraham, C.
    Lutz, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S526 - S527
  • [22] Breast Cancer Patients' Experience of External-Beam Radiotherapy
    Schnur, Julie B.
    Ouellette, Suzanne C.
    Bovbjerg, Dana H.
    Montgomery, Guy H.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (05) : 668 - 676
  • [23] A prospective study of radical external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy combined with intraluminal brachytherapy for primary esophageal cancer
    Ye, Mingyue
    Han, Dongmei
    Mao, Zhuang
    Cheng, Guanghui
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 21 (05) : 703 - 711
  • [24] PREOPERATIVE RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY WITH CAPECITABINE VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL CANCER
    Mihaylova, I.
    Parvanova, V.
    Dimitrova, N.
    Kurteva, G.
    Lazarov, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S398 - S398
  • [25] Radiotherapy of Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients - Current Approaches
    Feyer, Petra C.
    Steingraeber, Maria
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [26] A Comparative Study of Two Protocols of Concurrent Chemotherapy with External Beam Radiotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Plus Capecitabine Combination
    Niharika Bisht
    Sharad Bhatnagar
    Viswanath Sundaram
    Sankalp Singh
    Nishant Lohia
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2021, 19
  • [27] A Comparative Study of Two Protocols of Concurrent Chemotherapy with External Beam Radiotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Plus Capecitabine Combination
    Bisht, Niharika
    Bhatnagar, Sharad
    Sundaram, Viswanath
    Singh, Sankalp
    Lohia, Nishant
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [28] TREATING INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER WITH HYPOFRACTIONATED EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY ALONE
    Dal Pra, A.
    Faria, S.
    Cury, F.
    David, M.
    Duclos, M.
    Shenouda, G.
    Souhami, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S418 - S418
  • [29] Adjuvant External Beam Radiotherapy with Concurrent Cisplatin after Resection of Gallbladder Cancer
    Choudhary, Sunil
    Gupta, Neha
    Das, Avipsa
    Mani, Nilesh
    Singh, Rumita
    Ranjan, Ritika
    Lader, Neelam
    Jaiswal, Garima
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (02)
  • [30] EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY - HARD FACTS AND PAINFUL REALITIES
    VICK, NA
    PALEOLOGOS, NA
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 1995, 24 (01) : 93 - 95