Concurrent capecitabine with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in painful bone metastasis of breast cancer origin

被引:5
|
作者
Ahmed, Shimaa [1 ,2 ]
Kamal, Shereen M. [3 ,4 ]
Salah, Tareq [5 ]
Sedik, Mayada Fawzy [6 ]
Youssief, Ayatallah A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Radiat Oncol, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Nucl Med Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Intens Care Unit, Anesthesia, Assiut, Egypt
[4] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Pain Management Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[5] Assiut Univ, Assiut Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Clin Oncol & Nucl Med Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[6] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Med Oncol & Hematol Malignancies Dept, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
Concurrent capecitabine; Palliative radiotherapy; Pain score; Breast cancer; Bone metastases; RADIATION-THERAPY; METAANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; TRIALS; SINGLE; CHEMORADIATION; FRACTIONATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; PALLIATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100395
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In breast cancer, painful bone metastases are common. Local radiotherapy is the standard treatment of painful bone metastases. Pain control and overall response rateswere low in radiotherapy alone. The objectives of this study were to compare the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine vs. external beam radiotherapy alone in pain control of painful bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-four patients with painful bone metastases from breast cancer participated in this prospective study. We randomized the patients into two groups: group A treated with radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions and group B treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) every 12 hrs. concurrently with the same radiotherapy dose. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding early treatment toxicity. Most of the toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and mild (grade I or II). The median pain score decreased from week one, and there was a marked response at week4. The difference in median pain score between both groups was statistically significant with p-value = 0.045. The median analgesic score in both groups was statistically significant with a p-value = 0.032 at week 12. A complete response to pain at week 4 was 19% and 42.9% in groups A and B, respectively. Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiation in painful bone metastases from breast cancer origin was tolerable and safe; it had a higher overall response rate and pain palliation than radiotherapy alone. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phase II Study of Concurrent Capecitabine and External Beam Radiotherapy for Pain Control of Bone Metastases of Breast Cancer Origin
    Kundel, Yulia
    Nasser, Nicola J.
    Purim, Ofer
    Yerushalmi, Rinat
    Fenig, Eyal
    Pfeffer, Raphael M.
    Stemmer, Salomon M.
    Rizel, Shulamith
    Symon, Zvi
    Kaufman, Bella
    Sulkes, Aaron
    Brenner, Baruch
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [2] A pilot phase II study of concurrent capesitabine (Xelodatm) and external beam radiotherapy for bone metastases of breast cancer origin
    Kundel, Y.
    Yerushalmi, R.
    Fenig, E.
    Pfeffer, R.
    Stemmer, S.
    Rizel, S.
    Symon, Z.
    Kaufman, B.
    Sulkes, A.
    Brenner, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S426 - S427
  • [3] Palliative External Beam Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases
    Phillips, I.
    Locke, I.
    Kirby, A.
    Rahman, F.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 : S1 - +
  • [4] Outcomes and complications of intraoperative radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer
    Zangouri, Vahid
    Roshanshad, Amirhossein
    Ranjbar, Aliyeh
    Izadi, Mahsa
    Rajaeifar, Sara
    Goodarzi, Ali
    Nasrollahi, Hamid
    CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [5] Concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy for high risk breast cancer.
    Goyal, Uma
    Gonzalez, Victor Jose
    Ley, Michele Lynn Boyce
    Chalasani, Pavani
    Viscusi, Rebecca Klein
    Lebeau, Lauren
    Livingston, Robert B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [6] Intraoperative radiotherapy plus external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy alone for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: A case control study
    Korytko, T. P.
    Alvarez-Breckenridge, C.
    Mayerson, J. L.
    Neki, A.
    Wakely, P. E.
    Young, G. S.
    Kim, E. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S120 - S121
  • [7] EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY AND RADIONUCLIDE THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PAINFUL BONE METASTASES
    Montesi, M. A.
    De Pascalis, G.
    Dognini, J.
    Masi, D.
    Cassese, R.
    Santarelli, M.
    Raffetto, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S374 - S374
  • [8] Radiotherapy for solitary bone metastasis of breast cancer
    Toba, T.
    Nakamura, K.
    Shioyama, Y.
    Ohga, S.
    Yamaguchi, T.
    Yoshitake, T.
    Terashima, H.
    Honda, H.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 124 - 124
  • [9] intraoperative radiotherapy versus external beam radiation in suitable breast cancer patients
    Jitwatcharakomol, Tanun
    Setakornnukul, Jiraporn
    Thephamongkhol, Kullathorn
    Chuthapisith, Suebwong
    Ratanawichitrasin, Adune
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S482 - S483
  • [10] LOCALLY ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - RADIOTHERAPY ALONE VERSUS SURGERY AND RADIOTHERAPY
    MARTIJN, H
    CASPERS, RJL
    WELVAART, K
    VANDERVELDE, C
    HERMANS, J
    LEER, JWH
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 16 (01) : 23 - 29