Implementation of a restrictive opioid prescription protocol after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery

被引:5
|
作者
Kim, Soyoun Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Laframboise, Stephane [2 ]
Nelson, Gregg [3 ]
McCluskey, Stuart A. [4 ]
Avery, Lisa [5 ]
Kujbid, Nastasia [2 ]
Zia, Aysha [2 ]
Bernardini, Marcus Q. [2 ]
Ferguson, Sarah Elizabeth [2 ]
May, Taymaa [2 ]
Hogen, Liat [2 ]
Cybulska, Paulina [2 ]
Bouchard-Fortier, Genevieve [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Gynecol Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Canc Ctr, Gynecol Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Pain; cancer pain; postoperative care; SOCIETY; GUIDELINES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2021-002968
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Opioids are routinely prescribed after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery, with minimal data to inform the ideal dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a restrictive opioid prescription protocol on the median morphine milligram equivalents prescribed and pain control in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. Methods A restrictive opioid prescription protocol was implemented from January through December 2020 at a single tertiary cancer center in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for suspected malignancy were included. Simultaneously, we implemented use of multimodal analgesia, patient and provider education, pre-printed standardized prescriptions, and tracking of opioid prescriptions. Total median morphine milligram equivalents prescribed were compared between pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Patients were surveyed regarding opioid use and pain control at 30 days post-surgery. Results A total of 101 women in the post-intervention cohort were compared with 92 consecutive pre-intervention controls. Following protocol implementation, median morphine milligram equivalents prescribed decreased from 50 (range 9-100) to 25 (range 8-75) (p<0.001). In the post-intervention cohort, 75% (76/101) used 10 median morphine milligram equivalents or less and 55 patients (54%) used 0 median morphine milligram equivalent. There was no additional increase in opioid refill requests after implementation of our strategy. Overall, patients reported a median pain score of 3/10 at 30 days post-surgery; the highest pain scores and most of the pain occurred in the first week after surgery. Conclusions Implementation of a restrictive opioid prescription protocol led to a significant reduction in opioid use after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery, with over 50% of patients requiring no opioids postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1588
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Improving Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery
    Chescheir, Nancy C.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (01): : 203 - 203
  • [22] Cost impact analysis of enhanced recovery after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery
    Mitric, Cristina
    Kosa, Sarah Daisy
    Kim, Soyoun Rachel
    Nelson, Gregg
    Laframboise, Stephane
    Bouchard-Fortier, Genevieve
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (11) : 1786 - 1793
  • [23] Predictors of Admission After the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Keil, Dayley S.
    Schiff, Lauren D.
    Carey, Erin T.
    Moulder, Janelle K.
    Goetzinger, Amy M.
    Patidar, Seema M.
    Hance, Lyla M.
    Kolarczyk, Lavinia M.
    Isaak, Robert S.
    Strassle, Paula D.
    Schoenherr, Jay W.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (03): : 776 - 783
  • [24] Tackling the opioid crisis: Implementation of an ultra-restrictive opioid prescription protocol in patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery radically decreased dispensed opioid without reducing pain control
    Mark, J. E.
    Phoenix, D.
    Gutierrez, C. A.
    Morrell, K.
    Eng, K. H.
    Mayor, P. C.
    Akers, S. N.
    Lele, S. B.
    Odunsi, K.
    DeLeon, O.
    Frederick, P. J.
    Zsiros, E.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 5 - 5
  • [25] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Chao, Lisa
    Lin, Emily
    Kho, Kimberly
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 49 (02) : 381 - 395
  • [26] Regarding "Managing Postoperative Pain After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic"
    Cheng, Claudia
    Healey, Martin
    Dior, Uri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : 988 - 988
  • [27] Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Improving Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery Reply
    Chen, Lee-may
    Chen, Lee-lynn
    Chapman, Jocelyn S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (01): : 208 - 208
  • [28] COST-ANALYSIS OF AN ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAM AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY SURGERY
    Mitric, Cristina
    Kim, Soyoun Rachel
    Nelson, Gregg
    Laframboise, Stephane
    Mccluskey, Stuart
    Avery, Lisa
    Kujbid, Nastasia
    Zia, Aysha
    Spenard, Elisabeth
    Bernardini, Marcus
    Ferguson, Sarah
    May, Taymaa
    Hogen, Liat
    Cybulska, Paulina
    Marcon, Edyta
    Bouchard-Fortier, Genevieve
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 : A210 - A210
  • [29] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) does not have a significant impact after minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Lehman, A.
    Higgins, R. V.
    Kemp, E. V.
    Brown, J.
    Crane, E. K.
    Tait, D. L.
    Taylor, V. D.
    Naumann, R. W.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 281 - 281
  • [30] Gynecologic Oncology: Challenges of Minimally Invasive Surgery In a Field of Maximal Complexities
    Lyons, Yasmin A.
    Stephan, Jean-Marie
    Gonzalez Bosquet, Jesus
    Goodheart, Michael J.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 63 (01): : 30 - 39