What will be the possible barriers to consumers' adoption of smart home services?

被引:85
|
作者
Hong, Areum [1 ]
Nam, Changi [1 ]
Kim, Seongcheol [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Business & Technol Management, Coll Business, N22,291 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Sch Media & Commun, 145 Anam Dong, Seoul 02841, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Smart home; Internet of things; Barriers; Resistance; Perceived risk; Uncertainty; PERCEIVED RISK; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; RESISTANCE; SYSTEMS; INTANGIBILITY; INTEGRATION; ATTITUDES; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101867
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Recently, smart home services have come to the forefront as part of the growing market for the "Internet of Things." Since these smart home services were introduced, they have been expected to grow rapidly. However, contrary to optimistic expectations for future market growth, the smart home market has appeared to hit a roadblock and remains at an early market stage. This study attempts to identify the possible barriers that consumers perceive when they are introduced to smart home services. Based on the resistance theory and perceived risk model, we investigate the relationship between perceived risk and resistance to smart home services, using technological uncertainty and service intangibility as the antecedents of perceived risk. Dividing perceived risk into four dimensions performance risk, financial risk, privacy risk, and psychological risk the empirical results show that these four risk types are affected by technology uncertainty and service intangibility, and the perceived risks, except for financial risk, have positive effects on the resistance to smart home services. When the survey respondents are divided into two types, postponers and rejecters, the result of postponers is similar with that of total sample, except that privacy risk is unimportant to postponers, and the result of rejecter cannot satisfy the recommended model fit.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes
    Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye
    Davidson, Rosemary
    Bicket, Martha
    Whitmarsh, Lorraine
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 363 - 374
  • [12] Examining Consumers' Adoption of Smart Wearable Payments
    Hidayat-ur-Rehman, Imdadullah
    Ahmad, Arshad
    Akhter, Fahim
    Rehman, Mohd Ziaur
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [13] Association between the benefits and barriers perceived by the users in smart home services implementation
    Nascimento, Debora Rosa
    Tortorella, Guilherme Luz
    Fettermann, Diego
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (12) : 6179 - 6202
  • [14] Hospital at Home Program: Barriers to Adoption
    Kapadia, Shabana
    Parush, Dr. Avi
    Kung, Sonya
    Porbeni, Edoye
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI 2021), 2021, : 439 - 440
  • [15] Building smart services for smart home
    Chemishkian, S
    [J]. 2002 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NETWORKED APPLIANCES, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 215 - 224
  • [16] Personal goals in consumers' adoption of mHealth services
    Schuster, Lisa
    Parkinson, Joy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (01) : 30 - 51
  • [17] Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework
    Li, Wenda
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    Erol, Isil
    Liu, Aaron
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 80
  • [18] Smart Recommendation of Mobile Services to Consumers
    Ganchev, Ivan
    Ji, Zhanlin
    O'Droma, Mairtin
    Zhao, Li
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2017, 63 (04) : 499 - 508
  • [19] Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective
    Basarir-Ozel, Birgul
    Turker, Hande Bahar
    Nasir, Vesile Aslihan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [20] Smart Home Technology Adoption and Learning
    Wright, David
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (PROCOMM), 2019, : 93 - 96