Political parties matter: the impact of the populist radical right on health
被引:26
|
作者:
Falkenbach, Michelle
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
Falkenbach, Michelle
[1
]
Greer, Scott L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Global Publ Hlth & Polit Sci, Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
Greer, Scott L.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Global Publ Hlth & Polit Sci, Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
This paper presents the basic political science consensus on parties and their impact on policy, then turns to focus on the impact of the populist radical right (PRR) parties on policy, what PRR parties have done to implement their views and whether they make a difference. Three effects on policy were established: 1) they de-emphasize the issue, preferring to focus on migration, crime and security rather than health and welfare and 2) they prefer to pursue exclusionary policies. 3) it is not clear whether they increase or decrease benefits for the "native" populations they claim to represent. In short PRR parties make a difference whether to migrants or conservative governments, this party group matters.