Proton pencil beam scanning for mediastinal lymphoma: the impact of interplay between target motion and beam scanning

被引:26
|
作者
Zeng, C. [1 ]
Plastaras, J. P. [1 ]
Tochner, Z. A. [1 ]
White, B. M. [1 ]
Hill-Kayser, C. E. [1 ]
Hahn, S. M. [1 ]
Both, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 07期
关键词
mediastinal lymphoma; proton therapy; pencil beam scanning; interplay effect; IMAGE REGISTRATION; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; HODGKIN LYMPHOMA; DELIVERY; INTRAFRACTION; GANTRY; IMRT; LUNG;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/3013
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) for the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma. A group of 7 patients of varying tumor size (100-800 cc) were planned using a PBS anterior field. We investigated 17 fractions of 1.8 Gy(RBE) to deliver 30.6 Gy(RBE) to the internal target volume (ITV). Spots with s ranging from 4 mm to 8 mm were used for all patients, while larger spots (s = 6-16 mm) were employed for patients with motion perpendicular to the beam (. 5 mm), based on initial 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) motion evaluation. We considered volumetric repainting such that the same field would be delivered twice in each fraction. The ratio of extreme inhalation amplitude and regular tidal inhalation amplitude (free-breathing variability) was quantified as an indicator of potential irregular breathing during the scanning. Four-dimensional dose was calculated on the 4D CT scans based on the respiratory trace and beam delivery sequence, implemented by partitioning the spots into separate plans on each 4D CT phase. Four starting phases (end of inhalation, end of exhalation, middle of inhalation and middle of exhalation) were sampled for each painting and 4 energy switching times (0.5 s, 1 s, 3 s and 5 s) were tested, which resulted in 896 dose distributions for the analyzed cohort. Plan robustness was measured for the target and critical structures in terms of the percent difference between 'delivered' dose (4D-evaluated) and planned dose (calculated on average CT). It was found that none of the patients exhibited highly variable or chaotic breathing patterns. For all patients, the ITV D-98% was degraded by < 2% (standard deviations similar to 0.1%) when averaged over the whole treatment course. For six out of seven patients, the average degradation of ITV D-98% per fraction was within 5%. For one patient with motion perpendicular to the beam (>= 5 mm), the degradation of ITV D-98% per fraction was up to 15%, which was mitigated to 2% by employing larger spots and repainting. Deviation of mean lung dose was at most 0.2 Gy(RBE) (less than 1% of prescribed dose, 30.6 Gy(RBE)), while the deviation of heart maximum dose and cord maximum dose could exceed 5% of the prescribed dose. No significant difference in either target coverage or normal tissue dose was observed for different energy switching times compared via two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (p < 0.05). This feasibility study demonstrates that, for mediastinal lymphoma, the impact of the interplay effect on the PBS plan robustness is minimal when volumetric repainting and/or larger spots are employed.
引用
收藏
页码:3013 / 3029
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental Interpretation of the Dose Interplay in Treating Lung Cancer Using Proton Pencil Beam Scanning: Target Coverage, Motion Amplitude and Paintings
    Kang, M.
    Xiong, W.
    Hu, L.
    Choi, J. I.
    Simoneii, C. B.
    Lin, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E778 - E779
  • [22] Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Paediatric Neuroblastoma with Motion Mitigation Strategy for Moving Target Volumes
    Lim, P. S.
    Pica, A.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Bachtiary, B.
    Walser, M.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Weber, D. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (07) : 467 - 476
  • [23] Investigating the Impact of An Unfocused Collimator in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Geoghegan, T.
    Smith, B.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Flynn, R.
    Wang, D.
    Hyer, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E424 - E425
  • [24] Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer
    Moller, Ditte Sloth
    Poulsen, Per Rugaard
    Hagner, Andreas
    Dufour, Mathieu
    Nordsmark, Marianne
    Nyeng, Tine Bisballe
    Mortensen, Hanna Rahbek
    Lutz, Christina Maria
    Hoffmann, Lone
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (02): : 539 - 548
  • [25] Intrafraction motion and proton beam scanning
    Knopf, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S13 - S13
  • [26] Measurement-based study on characterizing symmetric and asymmetric respiratory motion interplay effect on target dose distribution in the proton pencil beam scanning
    Lee, Eunsin
    Perry, Daniel
    Speth, Joseph
    Zhang, Yongbin
    Xiao, Zhiyan
    Mascia, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (04): : 59 - 67
  • [27] Improving the precision and performance of proton pencil beam scanning
    Safai, Sairos
    Bula, Christian
    Meer, David
    Pedroni, Eros
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (03) : 196 - 206
  • [28] Pencil Beam Scanning:: a dynamical approach to proton therapy
    Sepulchre, R
    Gérard, M
    Marchand, B
    Prieels, D
    Bauvir, B
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIO-INFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 370 - 375
  • [29] Implement Volumetric Repainting for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning
    Tang, S.
    Song, L.
    Du, K.
    Chang, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E270 - E270
  • [30] Proton FLASH: passive scattering or pencil beam scanning?
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Wang, Junliang
    Wang, Yuenan
    Peng, Hao
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (03):