Correlation between self-reported smoking status and serum cotinine during pregnancy

被引:53
|
作者
McDonald, SD
Perkins, SL
Walker, MC
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol & Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Obstet, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Gynecol, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
self-reported smoking; serum cotinine; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.08.016
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Maternal smoking is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Because of concerns of underreporting, investigators routinely perform biochemical testing to confirm smoking status, such as serum cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine, adding an increased cost to examine compliance. The objectives of this study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported smoking with serum cotinine as the gold standard and to determine the correlation between self-reported smoking in cigarettes per day and serum cotinine levels. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed women during the first trimester of pregnancy on their tobacco exposure. A total of 40 women reported that they were smokers, and 40 were nonsmokers, 1 of whom had quit 5 days prior. The mean (+/- S.D.) serum cotinine value among smokers was 155 (+/- 122) ng/l, vs. 1 (+/- 6) ng/I in nonsmokers, p < 0.001. The sensitivity of self-reported smoking status was 97.6%, and the specificity was 100%. Comparing the reported number of cigarettes smoked and the serum cotinine level, the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.92 (p=0.015) overall and 0.67 (p=0.088) for the subgroup of smokers. This study demonstrates that self-reported smoking exposure during pregnancy is highly accurate. The high correlation coefficient suggests that this is a robust surrogate for cotinine levels. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 857
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determination of smoking status of rheumatoid arthritis patients by means of a self-reported questionnaire and serum cotinine assay: a cross-sectional study
    Naraghi, Kamran
    Booth, Mark
    Russell, Andrew J.
    van Laar, Jacob M.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2011, 70 (12) : 2235 - 2236
  • [42] Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status
    Wong, Suzy L.
    Shields, Margot
    Leatherdale, Scott
    Malaison, Eric
    Hammond, David
    HEALTH REPORTS, 2012, 23 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [43] Association of self-reported and cotinine-verified smoking status with incidence of metabolic syndrome in 47379 Korean adults
    Kim, Byung Jin
    Kang, Jeong Gyu
    Han, Ji Min
    Kim, Ji Hye
    Lee, Seung Jae
    Seo, Dae Chul
    Lee, Sung Ho
    Kim, Bum Soo
    Kang, Jin Ho
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2019, 11 (05) : 402 - 409
  • [44] Urine cotinine versus self-reported smoking and the risk of chronic kidney disease
    Kunutsor, Setor
    Dey, Richard
    Touw, Daan
    Bakker, Stephan
    Dullaart, Robin
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 39 (10) : 1683 - 1691
  • [46] VALIDATION OF SELF-REPORTED SMOKING-BEHAVIOR - BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF COTININE AND THIOCYANATE
    HALEY, NJ
    AXELRAD, CM
    TILTON, KA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1983, 73 (10) : 1204 - 1207
  • [47] Confirmation of self-reported non-smoking status by salivary cotinine among diabetes patients in Kerala, India
    Mini, G. K.
    Nichter, Mark
    Nair, Radhakrishnan R.
    Thankappan, K. R.
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2015, 3 (01): : 44 - 46
  • [48] Comparison of self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels in a rural pregnant population
    Britton, GRA
    Brinthaupt, J
    Stehle, JM
    James, GD
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2004, 33 (03): : 306 - 311
  • [49] Smoking status and pregnancy Utility of point of care cotinine test during pregnancy
    Cope, Graham F.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339
  • [50] MISCLASSIFICATION OF SMOKING STATUS BY SELF-REPORTED CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
    PEREZSTABLE, EJ
    MARIN, G
    MARIN, BV
    BENOWITZ, NL
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 145 (01): : 53 - 57