Quality of care achievements of the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria

被引:29
|
作者
Sampurno, Fanny [1 ]
Earnest, Arul [1 ]
Kumari, Patabendi B. [1 ]
Millar, Jeremy L. [2 ]
Davis, Ian D. [3 ]
Murphy, Declan G. [4 ]
Frydenberg, Mark [5 ,6 ]
Kearns, Paul A. [6 ]
Evans, Sue M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Alfred Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Geelong Urol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; RISK; MEN; IMPROVEMENT; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.5694/mja15.01041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyse the performance of the quality of prostate cancer (CaP) care over a 5-year period with reference to three quality indicators (QIs) reported by the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registrye-Victoria (PCOR-Vic): QI-1: Alignment with the modified Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol guideline; QI-2: Timeliness of CaP care for men with high risk and locally advanced disease; QI-3: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) for organ-confined pathological T2 disease. Design, setting and participants: Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013, 4708 men diagnosed with CaP who met the QI-1, QI-2 or QI-3 inclusion criteria were recruited from Victorian hospitals. Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Trend analysis was conducted to monitor performance according to QI-1, QI-2 and QI-3. We used the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model to account for any inherent autocorrelation in the data when analysing the monthly incidence of each indicator. Differences in the annual figures for the indicators across years were also analysed by aggregating data by year and applying the ARIMA model. Results and limitations: There was a downward trend over the 5 years in the percentage of men with low risk disease who underwent active treatment (45% to 34%; P = 0.024), an upward trend in the percentage of those with high risk and locally advanced disease who received active treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (88% to 93%; P = 0.181), and a decline in PSM rate in men with pathological T2 disease after radical prostatectomy (21% to 12%; P = 0.036). Limitations of the study include the fact that the improvement in the QIs was detected using PCOR-Vic as a single population, but there may be institutional variations in quality improvement. Conclusions: Over 2009-2013, the performance of the Victorian health system improved according to the three processes of care indicators reported by the PCOR-Vic.
引用
收藏
页码:319.e1 / 319.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the quality of prostate cancer care
    Penson, David F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [22] Quality registry for prostate cancer: hospital-based registration versus Netherlands Cancer Registry
    Heesterman B.L.
    Olthof E.M.G.
    van der Poel H.G.
    van Moorselaar R.J.A.
    Aben K.K.H.
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2021, 11 (2-3) : 34 - 43
  • [23] GPs' Insights into Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Care in Regional Victoria, Australia
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Evans, Sue
    Millar, Jeremy
    Holton, Sara
    Mazza, Danielle
    Fisher, Jane
    Kirkman, Maggie
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2016, 21 (12) : 2365 - 2379
  • [24] Delays in prostate cancer care within a hospital network in Victoria, Australia
    Qu, Liang G.
    Nzenza, Tatenda
    McMillan, Kevin
    Sengupta, Shomik
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (12) : 1599 - 1604
  • [25] Receipt of Best Care According to Current Quality of Care Measures and Outcomes in Men with Prostate Cancer COMMENT
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Quoc Dien Trinh
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (02): : 505 - 505
  • [26] Variations in prostate cancer patterns of care: Is it the quality of care or the quality of the data?
    Penson, DF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (31) : 7783 - 7784
  • [27] International Variations in Surgical Quality of Care in Men With Prostate Cancer: Results From the TrueNTH Global Registry
    Sibert, Nora Tabea
    Garin, Olatz
    Ferrer, Montserrat
    Connor, Sarah E.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Litwin, Mark S.
    Millar, Jeremy
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Nguyen, Anissa V.
    Paich, Kellie
    Kowalski, Christoph
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10
  • [28] Addressing the Disparities in Prostate Cancer Care and Outcomes
    Kittles, Rick
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2019, 33 (07): : 256 - 259
  • [29] Importance of a prostate cancer registry for describing changing patterns of care
    Murphy, D. G.
    Evans, S. M.
    Millar, J. L.
    Davis, I. D.
    Bolton, D.
    Giles, G. G.
    Frydenberg, M.
    Andrianopoulos, N.
    Wood, J. M.
    Frauman, A. G.
    Costello, A.
    Mcneil, J. J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 61 - 61
  • [30] PROSTATE CANCER Care beyond prostate cancer-improving patient outcomes
    Frydenberg, Mark
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2014, 11 (12) : 669 - 670