DETERMINATION OF ANODE-PORE TORTUOSITY FROM GAS AND CURRENT FLOW RATES IN SOFCS

被引:0
|
作者
Schmidt, V. Hugo [1 ]
Tsai, Chih-Long [1 ]
Lediaev, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Phys, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The effect of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) anode thickness, porosity, pore size, and pore tortuosity on fuel and exhaust gas flow is calculated. Also determined is the concentration of these gases and of diluent gases as a function of position across the anode. The calculation is based on the "dusty-gas" model which includes Knudsen diffusion (wall collision) effects as well as unlike-molecule collision effects in the Stefan-Maxwell equation set. This equation set is solved exactly, avoiding commonly-made approximations such as the assumption of uniform total gas pressure across the anode. The formulae we developed are applied to results of careful experiments performed by another group, who used binary and ternary gas mixtures on the anode side of an SOFC. Our values for tortuosity are in fair agreement, once a difference in nomenclature is taken into account, with those obtained by that group who made some common approximations that we avoided. The nomenclature difference consists in their definition of tortuosity being what some call tortuosity factor, which is the square of what we and others call tortuosity. The results emphasize the need for careful design of anode pore structures, especially in anode-supported SOFC's which require thicker anodes.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 140
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determination of chromium from a hydroxylamine catalytic current by flow-injection analysis
    Fitsev, IM
    Zolotukhin, AV
    Toropova, VF
    Fitseva, NA
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 53 (02) : 109 - 111
  • [42] Comparisons of national standards in the field of gas flow rate and volume, gas flow rates from 20 to 6500 m3/h
    Mingaleev, A. V.
    Yakovlev, A. B.
    Mickan, B.
    Bardonov, A. I.
    Serediuk, D.
    Stankevicius, A.
    Busuladzic, I.
    METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (1A)
  • [43] Methanol diffusion rates through the anode diffusion layer in direct methanol fuel cells from limiting current measurements
    Srikanth Arisetty
    Suresh G. Advani
    Ajay K. Prasad
    Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 44 : 1199 - 1206
  • [44] Methanol diffusion rates through the anode diffusion layer in direct methanol fuel cells from limiting current measurements
    Arisetty, Srikanth
    Advani, Suresh G.
    Prasad, Ajay K.
    HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2008, 44 (10) : 1199 - 1206
  • [45] Prediction of gas flow rates from gas condensate reservoirs through wellhead chokes using a firefly optimization algorithm
    Ghorbani, Hamzeh
    Moghadasi, Jamshid
    Wood, David A.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 45 : 256 - 271
  • [46] Effect of Pore-Throat Heterogeneity on Gas-Water Flow in Tight Gas Reservoirs: From Micro- to Centimeter Scale
    Wang, Yijun
    Kang, Yili
    You, Lijun
    Chen, Mingjun
    Cheng, Youyou
    Tu, Yingqian
    Tian, Jian
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 38 (06) : 5075 - 5087
  • [47] Effect of gas flow rates and Boudouard reactions on the performance of Ni/YSZ anode supported solid oxide fuel cells with solid carbon fuels
    Chien, Andrew C.
    Chuang, Steven S. C.
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2011, 196 (10) : 4719 - 4723
  • [48] Current density analysis in a molten carbonate fuel cell unit with non-uniform inlet flow and high anode gas utilization
    Liu, Syu-Fang
    Chu, Hsin-Sen
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 2007, 28 (06): : 555 - 561
  • [49] Current density analysis in a molten carbonate fuel cell unit with non-uniform inlet flow and high anode gas utilization
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30010, Taiwan
    J Chin Soc Mech Eng Trans Chin Inst Eng Ser C, 2007, 6 (555-562):
  • [50] Maximizing postfrac gas flow rates from conventional; tight reservoirs (pg 76, 2012)
    Rahim, Zillur
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2012, 110 (05) : 83 - 83