Pfannenstiel versus Vertical Skin Incision for Cesarean Delivery in Women with Class III Obesity: A Randomized Trial

被引:14
|
作者
Marrs, Caroline [1 ]
Blackwell, Sean [2 ]
Hester, Ashley [2 ]
Olson, Gayle [1 ]
Saade, George R. [1 ]
Faro, Jonathan [2 ]
Pedroza, Claudia [3 ]
Sibai, Baha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 301 Univ Blvd,JSA 3-400, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Ctr Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
cesarean; skin incision; Pfannenstiel; transverse; vertical; wound infection; complication; obesity; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; WOUND COMPLICATIONS; SUBCUTANEOUS DRAIN; EXTREME OBESITY; RISK-FACTORS; DOUBLE-BLIND; DISRUPTION; CLOSURE; PROPHYLAXIS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1667287
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare Pfannenstiel versus vertical skin incision for the prevention of cesarean wound complications in morbidly obese women. Study Design Women with body mass index40 kg/m (2) undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) were randomly allocated to Pfannenstiel or vertical skin incision. The primary outcome was a wound complication within 6 weeks. Due to a low consent rate, we limited enrollment to a defined time period for feasibility. We conducted a traditional frequentist analysis with log-binomial regression to obtain relative risks (RRs), and a Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of treatment benefit. A priori, we decided that a 60% probability of treatment benefit for either incision type would be convincing evidence to pursue a larger trial. Results A total of 648 women were approached, 228 were consented, and 91 were randomized. The primary outcome rate was 19% in the Pfannenstiel group and 21% in the vertical group (RR: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.85). Bayesian analysis revealed a 59% probability that Pfannenstiel had a lower primary outcome rate. Conclusion In the first published randomized trial to compare skin incision types for obese women undergoing CD, we were unable to demonstrate differences in clinical outcomes. Our trial suggests that a larger study would have a low probability for different findings. Trial Registration NCT 01897376 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transverse versus longitudinal blunt extension of the uterine incision during cesarean section in women with a uterine scar of previous cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial
    Torky, Haitham A.
    Abo-Louz, Ashraf S.
    Aly, Rania H.
    El-Taher, Osama S.
    Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen
    El-Baz, Ashraf
    Galal, Samir
    Dief, Osama
    Abdelhalim, Diaa
    Marie, Heba
    Hussein, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (10)
  • [32] Nulliparous Individuals with Class III Obesity: Adverse Outcomes with Labor versus Planned Cesarean Delivery
    Cagino, Kristen A.
    Chen, Han-Yang
    Becker, Cabrina
    Red, Beverly
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024,
  • [33] Predictors of prolonged skin incision to delivery interval in cesarean: the relative impact of obesity
    Edlow, Andrea
    Villalon, Rachel
    Sisman, Betul
    House, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S330 - S330
  • [34] Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery
    Hibbard, Judith U.
    Gilbert, Sharon
    Landon, Mark B.
    Hauth, John C.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Gabbe, Steven G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (01): : 125 - 133
  • [35] A randomized controlled trial of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision during cesarean delivery
    El-Khayat, Waleed
    Elsharkawi, Mohamed
    Hassan, Amr
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 127 (02) : 163 - 166
  • [36] Risk Factors Associated With Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Women With Class III Obesity
    Teefey, Christina
    Reforma, Liberty
    Koelper, Nathanael C.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Levine, Lisa D.
    Durnwald, Celeste P.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (03): : 542 - 549
  • [37] Wound Disruption Following Cesarean Delivery in Women With Class III Obesity, a Retrospective Observational Study
    Sagi, Yair
    Maxwell, Cynthia
    Snelgrove, John
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Vernon, James
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 119S - 119S
  • [38] Risk Factors Associated With Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor and Women With Class III Obesity
    Grimes, Sarah Bundrick
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (02): : 420 - 421
  • [39] Risk factors associated with cesarean delivery after induction of labor in women with class III obesity
    Teefey, Christina P.
    Reforma, Liberty
    Levine, Lisa D.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Durnwald, Celeste P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S251 - S251
  • [40] A randomized trial of closed incision negative pressure therapy in morbidly obese women undergoing cesarean delivery
    Hussamy, Deana J.
    Wortman, Alison C.
    McIntire, Donald D.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Roberts, Scott W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S35 - S35