Pfannenstiel versus Vertical Skin Incision for Cesarean Delivery in Women with Class III Obesity: A Randomized Trial

被引:14
|
作者
Marrs, Caroline [1 ]
Blackwell, Sean [2 ]
Hester, Ashley [2 ]
Olson, Gayle [1 ]
Saade, George R. [1 ]
Faro, Jonathan [2 ]
Pedroza, Claudia [3 ]
Sibai, Baha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 301 Univ Blvd,JSA 3-400, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Ctr Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
cesarean; skin incision; Pfannenstiel; transverse; vertical; wound infection; complication; obesity; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; WOUND COMPLICATIONS; SUBCUTANEOUS DRAIN; EXTREME OBESITY; RISK-FACTORS; DOUBLE-BLIND; DISRUPTION; CLOSURE; PROPHYLAXIS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1667287
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare Pfannenstiel versus vertical skin incision for the prevention of cesarean wound complications in morbidly obese women. Study Design Women with body mass index40 kg/m (2) undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) were randomly allocated to Pfannenstiel or vertical skin incision. The primary outcome was a wound complication within 6 weeks. Due to a low consent rate, we limited enrollment to a defined time period for feasibility. We conducted a traditional frequentist analysis with log-binomial regression to obtain relative risks (RRs), and a Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of treatment benefit. A priori, we decided that a 60% probability of treatment benefit for either incision type would be convincing evidence to pursue a larger trial. Results A total of 648 women were approached, 228 were consented, and 91 were randomized. The primary outcome rate was 19% in the Pfannenstiel group and 21% in the vertical group (RR: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.85). Bayesian analysis revealed a 59% probability that Pfannenstiel had a lower primary outcome rate. Conclusion In the first published randomized trial to compare skin incision types for obese women undergoing CD, we were unable to demonstrate differences in clinical outcomes. Our trial suggests that a larger study would have a low probability for different findings. Trial Registration NCT 01897376 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pfannenstiel vs. vertical skin incision for cesarean delivery in women with class III obesity: a randomized clinical trial
    Marrs, Caroline
    Blackwell, Sean
    Hester, Ashley
    Olson, Gayle
    Saade, George
    Faro, Jon
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Sibai, Bahaeddine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S29 - S29
  • [2] Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial
    Giacalone, PL
    Daures, JP
    Vignal, J
    Herisson, C
    Hedon, B
    Laffargue, F
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (05): : 745 - 750
  • [3] Abdominal Incision Selection for Cesarean Delivery of Women with Class III Obesity
    Sutton, Amelia L.
    Sanders, Lauren B.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 33 (06) : 547 - 551
  • [4] Wound complications following cesarean delivery of patients with HELLP syndrome: Pfannenstiel versus vertical skin incision
    Schorr, SJ
    Sullivan, CA
    Calfee, EF
    Blake, PG
    Pickett, RA
    Martin, JN
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 1998, 17 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [5] A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery
    Feese, Catherine A.
    Johnson, Steven
    Jones, Emily
    Lambers, Donna S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (06) : 556.e1 - 556.e5
  • [6] Absorbable versus metal staples for cesarean delivery skin incision closure: A randomized controlled trial
    Myers, Victoria
    Weed, Samantha
    Daskalakis, Constantine
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    Baxter, Jason
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : S100 - S100
  • [7] Comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
    Zaki, Mary N.
    Wing, Deborah A.
    McNulty, Jennifer A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S28 - S29
  • [8] Role of subcutaneous closure in preventing wound complications after cesarean delivery with Pfannenstiel incision: A randomized clinical trial
    Esmer, Aytul Corbacioglu
    Goksedef, Pinar Cilesiz
    Akca, Aysu
    Akbayir, Ozgur
    Dagdeviren, Hediye
    Turan, Gulden Yanik
    Yarsilikal, Filiz
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (03) : 728 - 735
  • [9] A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section
    Saha, Shyama Prasad
    Bhattarcherjee, Nabendu
    Das Mahanta, Sabysachi
    Naskar, Animesh
    Bhattacharyya, Sanjoy Kumar
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 14 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [10] Risk of cesarean delivery among pregnant women with class III obesity
    Borghesi, Yves
    Labreuche, Julien
    Duhamel, Alain
    Pigeyre, Marie
    Deruelle, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 136 (02) : 168 - 174