Insect biological control and non-target effects: a European perspective

被引:54
|
作者
Lynch, LD [1 ]
Hokkanen, HMT [1 ]
Babendreier, D [1 ]
Bigler, F [1 ]
Burgio, G [1 ]
Gao, ZH [1 ]
Kuske, S [1 ]
Loomans, A [1 ]
Menzler-Hokkanen, I [1 ]
Thomas, MB [1 ]
Tommasini, G [1 ]
Waage, JK [1 ]
van Lenteren, JC [1 ]
Zeng, QQ [1 ]
机构
[1] CABI Biosci, Ascot SL5 7TA, Berks, England
关键词
D O I
10.1079/9780851994536.0099
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A 4-year research project on 'Evaluating Environmental Risks of Biocontrol Introductions in Europe' (ERBIC) is described, and early results are presented. The project focuses on arthropod biological control (using both microbial and macrobial agents), and uses literature review, case studies with empirical work and various types of modelling to illuminate risk to non-target organisms. These methods will hopefully lead to the development of usable methodologies and guidelines for risk assessment in arthropod biological control, by the project's completion in 2002. Reviewing existing published and unpublished data on the classical biological control of insects (a first step in this project) has revealed that for only 1.5% of introductions is there some data regarding the realized field specificity of the agent. For a tiny proportion of introductions there are quantitative data regarding mortality in non-targets. From these cases, with some extrapolation, we can deduce that 10% or less of classical biological control introductions in the past led to population changes in non-targets. Data on population-level effects from simulated uses or trials suggest that 49% of inundative or augmentative uses of agents led to (local, short-term) population changes for non-targets. Case studies into: (i) exotic specialist parasitoids used in the greenhouse; (ii) exotic generalist parasitoids used inundatively in the field; (iii) exotic generalist predators used inundatively; and (iv) fungi and nematodes used as bioinsecticides, are outlined. The results so far demonstrate: (i) the apparent safety of Trichogramma (generalist parasitoid) releases in Switzerland, despite rare species within its host range; (ii) the lack of overwintering capability in northern Italy in one generalist predator (Orius insidiosis), but its presence in another (Harmonia axyridis); (iii) little evidence that the predation of certain stages of native predators by introduced predators will enhance environmental risks in the cases in question; and (iv) the apparent safety of bioinsecticide releases of particular pathogen strains for important naturally occurring predators when exposed directly or by feeding on infected prey.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 125
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of potential non-target effects of Tetrastichus julis, a biological control agent of the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus
    Vincent A. D. Hervet
    Héctor A. Cárcamo
    Lloyd M. Dosdall
    Terry D. Miller
    Swaroop V. Kher
    BioControl, 2016, 61 : 399 - 411
  • [42] Toxic effects of NSAIDs in non-target species: A review from the perspective of the aquatic environment
    Swiacka, Klaudia
    Michnowska, Alicja
    Maculewicz, Jakub
    Caban, Magda
    Smolarz, Katarzyna
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2021, 273
  • [43] Post-release evaluation of non-target effects of Torymus sinensis, the biological control agent of Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Italy
    Chiara Ferracini
    Ester Ferrari
    Marianna Pontini
    Lindsay Karen Hernández Nova
    Matteo A. Saladini
    Alberto Alma
    BioControl, 2017, 62 : 445 - 456
  • [44] Potential impact and non-target effects of Gallerucida bifasciata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a candidate biological control agent for Fallopia japonica
    Wang, Yangzhou
    Wilson, John R. U.
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhang, Jialiang
    Ding, Jianqing
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2010, 53 (03) : 319 - 324
  • [45] A process-based population dynamics model to explore target and non-target impacts of a biological control agent
    Kriticos, Darren J.
    Watt, Michael S.
    Withers, Toni M.
    Leriche, Agathe
    Watson, Michelle C.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2009, 220 (17) : 2035 - 2050
  • [46] The potential of transgenic chickpeas for pest control and possible effects on non-target arthropods
    Romeis, J
    Sharma, HC
    Sharma, KK
    Das, S
    Sarmah, BK
    CROP PROTECTION, 2004, 23 (10) : 923 - 938
  • [47] Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates
    Pisa, L. W.
    Amaral-Rogers, V.
    Belzunces, L. P.
    Bonmatin, J. M.
    Downs, C. A.
    Goulson, D.
    Kreutzweiser, D. P.
    Krupke, C.
    Liess, M.
    McField, M.
    Morrissey, C. A.
    Noome, D. A.
    Settele, J.
    Simon-Delso, N.
    Stark, J. D.
    Van der Sluijs, J. P.
    Van Dyck, H.
    Wiemers, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (01) : 68 - 102
  • [48] Effects of Herbicides on Non-Target Terrestrial Plants
    Strandberg, Beate
    Boutin, Celine
    Mathiassen, Solvejg K.
    Damgaard, Christian
    Dupont, Yoko L.
    Carpenter, David J.
    Kudsk, Per
    PESTICIDE DOSE: EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND TARGET AND NON-TARGET ORGANISMS, 2017, 1249 : 149 - 166
  • [49] A review of the non-target effects of fungi used to biologically control plant diseases
    Brimner, TA
    Boland, GJ
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 100 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [50] Effects of asulam spraying on non-target ferns
    Rowntree, JK
    Sheffield, E
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 2005, 83 (12): : 1622 - 1629