The energy consumption and emission of polyurethane pavement construction based on life cycle assessment

被引:45
|
作者
Cong, Lin [1 ]
Guo, Guihong [1 ]
Yu, Meng [2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Tan, Le [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Oriental Yuhong Waterproof Technol Co Ltd, State Key Lab Special Funct Waterproof Mat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Highway Adm Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Peoples R China
关键词
Polyurethane pavement; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Energy consumption; EDIP; 97; Impact category; PERFORMANCE; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120395
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Polyurethane-bounded pavement with good road performances is a new pavement form. Whether polyurethane (PU) pavement met the requirements of energy conservation, environmental protection and sustainable development or not, the energy consumption and emission of PU pavement in whole life cycle were analyzed systematically in this paper. Firstly, the life cycle of pavement was divided into six phases: material production, mixture production, transportation, construction, maintenance and recycling according to the construction technology of road in China. Based on the classification of the life cycle environmental impact assessment (LCIA), the effects of six main exhaust gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, CO, SO2, NOx) were divided into four categories: Global Warming Potential (GWP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), Photochemical Smog Potential (POCP) and Acidification Potential (AP). Secondly, the energy consumption and emission of each phase are studied, and the main phase with significant environmental impact was selected. Thirdly, the results of inventory would be normalized and weighted to analyze the environmental impact by the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). The LCIA method was environmental design of industrial product 97 (EDIP 97). Results show that the construction of PU pavement is conducive to energy conservation. Besides, the energy consumption of mixture production phase is the largest in asphalt pavement, and it is material production phase in PU pavement. In terms of emission, the emissions mainly occur in material production and mixture production phases in asphalt pavement, and it is material production phase in PU pavement. Under the same structure, the construction of PU pavement is not conducive to reducing the emission, and will enlarge the GWP, EP and AP. For example, the CO2, N2O and NOx emissions of PU pavement are 1.98, 5.30 and 2.35 times higher than that of asphalt pavement respectively, but the CO emission of asphalt pavement is 3.86 times higher than that of PU pavement. Furthermore, the results of LCIA show that the score of all environmental impact of PU pavement is little smaller than that of asphalt pavement after normalization and weighting. However, the road performances of PU pavement are much better than that of asphalt pavement. With the same environmental impact, PU pavement has a longer service life. It is summarized that PU pavement meets the requirements of environmental protection and sustainable development in the long run. This is conducive to the promotion and application of PU pavement. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life Cycle Assessment as a basis for a checklist for energy efficiency in road construction
    Andersson-Skold, Yvonne
    Bergman, Ramona
    Arm, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 395 - 395
  • [32] Energy Consumption of Asphalt and Reinforced Concrete Pavement Materials and Construction
    Zapata, Pablo
    Gambatese, John A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [33] Life cycle assessment as a tool in optimizing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission reductions in the production processes of motor fuels
    Rogowska, Delfina
    Syrek, Halina
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2011, 90 (06): : 1140 - 1144
  • [34] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Consumption, Pollutant Emission, and Cost Analysis of Coal/Oil/Biomass to Ethylene Glycol
    Xu, Simin
    Li, Zhiwei
    Yang, Qingchun
    Chu, Genyun
    Zhang, Jinliang
    Zhang, Dawei
    Zhou, Huairong
    Gao, Minglin
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (47) : 15849 - 15860
  • [35] Comparative pavement life cycle assessment with parameter uncertainty
    Noshadravan, Arash
    Wildnauer, Margaret
    Gregory, Jeremy
    Kirchain, Randolph
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 25 : 131 - 138
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of pavement: Methodology and case study
    Yu, Bin
    Lu, Qing
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 17 (05) : 380 - 388
  • [37] Airfield Pavement Life Cycle Assessment Framework and Guidelines
    Butt, A. A.
    Reger, D.
    Harvey, J. T.
    Garg, N.
    [J]. AIRFIELD AND HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS 2017: AIRFIELD PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY AND SAFETY, 2017, : 241 - 252
  • [38] Life Cycle Assessment in Road Pavement Infrastructures: A Review
    Gouveia, Bruno Guida
    Donato, Marina
    da Silva, Marcelino Aurelio Vieira
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2022, 8 (06): : 1304 - 1315
  • [39] Estimation of albedo effect in pavement life cycle assessment
    Yu, Bin
    Lu, Qing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 64 : 306 - 309
  • [40] Life cycle assessment in the environmental evaluation of pavement sections
    El análisis del ciclo de vida en la evaluación ambiental de secciones de firme
    [J]. Moral Quiza, Alberto, 2017, Asociacion Espanola de la Carretera (04):