The Current Versatility of Polyurethane Three-Dimensional Printing for Biomedical Applications

被引:0
|
作者
Griffin, Michelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Castro, Nathan [4 ]
Bas, Onur [4 ]
Saifzadeh, Siamak [4 ]
Butler, Peter [4 ]
Hutmacher, Dietmar Werner [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Free Hosp, Charles Wolfson Ctr Reconstruct Surg, London, England
[2] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London NW32AW, England
[3] Royal Free Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, London, England
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
polyurethane; 3D-printing; additive manufacturing; synthetic polymer; fused deposition modeling; stereolithography; TISSUE; BIOMATERIALS; SCAFFOLDS; COMPOSITES; NANOFIBERS; ACID; BIODEGRADATION; OPTIMIZATION; DEPOSITION; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0224
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Impact statement Polyurethane (PU) materials have been utilized for a number of biomedical applications due to their good biocompatibility and versatile properties. With advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, processing of PUs to more closely mimic the native extracellular matrix of human tissues and organs and provide enhanced tissue engineering applications can be achieved. This review highlights how various 3D printing processes offer a platform by which to manufacture implants with precise control over internal and external structures to create tissues with the desired outcomes. Reconstructive surgery aims to restore tissue defects by replacing them with similar autologous tissue to achieve good clinical outcomes. However, often the defect is too large or the tissue available is limited, requiring synthetic materials to restore the anatomical shape and partial function. The utilization of three-dimensional (3D) printing allows for the manufacture of implants with complex geometries and internal architecture that more closely matches the required clinical needs. Synthetic polymers offer certain advantages over natural polymers as biomedical materials due to their ability to more closely mimic the mechanical and chemical properties of the native tissue. Synthetic polymer materials such as poly(lactic acid) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene are easily 3D printed to generate 3D objects due to their flexibility in their chemical and mechanical properties and physical form. Polyurethanes (PUs) are widely used as short- and long-term, implantable medical devices due to their good mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and hemocompatibility. This article provides an overview on the advancement of 3D printable PU-based materials for biomedical applications. A summary of the chemical structure and synthesis of PUs is provided to explain how PUs may be processed into medical devices using additive manufacturing techniques. Currently, PUs are being explored by several 3D printing approaches, including fused filament fabrication, bioplotting, and stereolithography, to fabricate complex implants with precise patterns and shapes with fine resolution. PU scaffolds using 3D printing have shown good cell viability and tissue integrationin vivo. The important limitations of PU printing are identified to stimulate future research. PUs offer a biocompatible, synthetic polymeric material that can be 3D printed to manufacture implants that are tailored to meet specific anatomical, mechanical, and biological requirements for biomedical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 283
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-dimensional Printing in Plastic Surgery: Current Applications, Future Directions, and Ethical Implications
    Lynn, Alex Q.
    Pflibsen, Lacey R.
    Smith, Anthony A.
    Rebecca, Alanna M.
    Teven, Chad M.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (03) : E3465
  • [32] Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started
    Hoang, Don
    Perrault, David
    Stevanovic, Milan
    Ghiassi, Alidad
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (23)
  • [33] Current advances in three-dimensional tissue/organ printing
    Jeong Hun Park
    Jinah Jang
    Jung-Seob Lee
    Dong-Woo Cho
    [J]. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2016, 13 : 612 - 621
  • [34] Three-dimensional printing in anatomy teaching: current evidence
    Chytas, Dimitrios
    Johnson, Elizabeth O.
    Piagkou, Maria
    Tsakotos, George
    Babis, George C.
    Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
    Markatos, Konstantinos
    Natsis, Konstantinos
    [J]. SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2020, 42 (07) : 835 - 841
  • [35] The Current Role of Three-Dimensional Printing in Plastic Surgery
    Rogers-Vizena, Carolyn R.
    Weinstock, Peter
    Livingston, Katie
    Prabhu, Sanjay P.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (03) : 811E - 812E
  • [36] The Current Role of Three-Dimensional Printing in Plastic Surgery
    Kamali, Parisa
    Dean, David
    Skoracki, Roman
    Koolen, Pieter G. L.
    Paul, Marek A.
    Ibrahim, Ahmed M. S.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (03) : 1045 - 1055
  • [37] Current advances in three-dimensional tissue/organ printing
    Park, Jeong Hun
    Jang, Jinah
    Lee, Jung-Seob
    Cho, Dong-Woo
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (06) : 612 - 621
  • [38] Three-dimensional printing in anatomy teaching: current evidence
    Dimitrios Chytas
    Elizabeth O. Johnson
    Maria Piagkou
    George Tsakotos
    George C. Babis
    Vasileios S. Nikolaou
    Konstantinos Markatos
    Konstantinos Natsis
    [J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2020, 42 : 835 - 841
  • [39] Polyurethane-based three-dimensional printing for biological mesh carriers
    Wang, Feng
    Hou, Lin
    Shan, Yan-Hui
    Li, Zhen-Su
    Yang, Xiao-Feng
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [40] Three-Dimensional Printing in Analytical Chemistry: Principles and Applications
    Pohanka, Miroslav
    [J]. ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 2016, 49 (18) : 2865 - 2882