The Evolution of Food Security: Where Are We Now, Where Should We Go Next?

被引:37
|
作者
Akbari, Morteza [1 ]
Foroudi, Pantea [2 ]
Shahmoradi, Mohana [3 ]
Padash, Hamid [1 ]
Parizi, Zahra Shahabaldini [4 ]
Khosravani, Ala [5 ]
Ataei, Pouria [6 ]
Cuomo, Maria Teresa [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Entrepreneurship, Tehran 1439813141, Iran
[2] Middlesex Univ, Dept Mkt Branding & Tourism, London NW4 4BT, England
[3] Razi Univ, Dept Agr Extens & Educ, Kermanshah 6714414971, Iran
[4] Vali E Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Dept Management, Rafsanjan 7718897111, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran, Fac Management, Tehran 1417713114, Iran
[6] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Agr Extens & Educ, Tehran 11114115, Iran
[7] Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat, I-84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
关键词
food security; bibliometric review; co-citation analysis; co-occurrence analysis; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NUTRITIONAL-STATUS; DIETARY DIVERSITY; INSECURITY; IMPACTS; FISHERIES; HEALTH; INDICATORS; POVERTY; RISKS;
D O I
10.3390/su14063634
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food security is one of the most challenging topics globally; however, the concept of food security has taken on additional dimensions that are general and are less detailed. This study aims to identify the intellectual structure of food security research and the changes in this structure. This paper analyzed 3169 documents from the Web of Science database through a bibliometric review. A review of the published documents shows an increasing trend over the past 46 years. In accordance with co-occurrence analysis, 125 keywords were grouped into five clusters: food security and sustainable development; food security and socioeconomic factors; food security policy and governance; coping strategies for poverty, inequality, and hunger; and modern food security management. This study identifies four streams within food security research: sustainability and environmental, socioeconomic, cultural, and political factors. The paper concludes that even though food security might investigate many significant areas, other new dimensions should still be considered. Further gaps in the literature emerge that present avenues for future research directions. Reviewing indicators and techniques of food security assessment and identifying high-risk groups should be a priority.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条