Association of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Neurosurgical Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury With Thromboembolic Complications, Repeated Neurosurgery, and Mortality

被引:24
|
作者
Byrne, James P. [1 ]
Witiw, Christopher D. [2 ]
Schuster, James M. [3 ]
Pascual, Jose L. [4 ]
Cannon, Jeremy W. [4 ]
Martin, Niels D. [4 ]
Reilly, Patrick M. [4 ]
Nathens, Avery B. [5 ]
Seamon, Mark J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, 1800 Orleans St,Sheikh Zayed Tower,Ste 61078, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg & Spinal Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Penn Presbyterian Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Div Traumatol Surg Crit Care & Emergency Surg, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
BRIEF CONCEPTUAL TUTORIAL; SOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; RISK; ANTICOAGULATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5794
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE There is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among patients who undergo neurosurgical interventions for traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE To measure the association between timing of VTE prophylaxis after urgent neurosurgical intervention for TBI and thromboembolic and intracranial complications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included adult patients (aged >= 16 years) who underwent urgent neurosurgical interventions (craniotomy/ craniectomy or intracranial monitor/drain insertion within 24 hours after admission) for TBI at level 1 and 2 trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from January to August 2020. EXPOSURES Timing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation after urgent neurosurgical intervention (prophylaxis delay) measured in days (24-hour periods). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism). Secondary outcomes were repeated neurosurgery (neurosurgical reintervention after initiation of VTE prophylaxis) and mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between prophylaxis delay and each outcome at the patient level and were adjusted for patient baseline and injury characteristics. RESULTS The study included 4951 patients (3676 [74%] male; median age, 50 years [IQR, 31-64 years]) who underwent urgent neurosurgical intervention for TBI at 304 trauma centers. The median prophylaxis delay was 3 days (IQR, 1-5 days). After adjustment for patient baseline and injury characteristics, prophylaxis delay was associated with increased odds of VTE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.08 per day; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12). Earlier initiation of prophylaxis was associated with increased risk of repeated neurosurgery. During the first 3 days, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with a 28% decrease in odds of repeated neurosurgery (aOR, 0.72 per day; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88). After 3 days, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with an additional 15% decrease in odds of repeated neurosurgery (aOR, 0.85 per day; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90). Earlier prophylaxis was associated with greater mortality among patients who initially underwent intracranial monitor/drain procedures, such that each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with decreased odds of death (aOR, 0.94 per day; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of patients who underwent urgent neurosurgical interventions for TBI, early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk of thromboembolism. However, earlier initiation of prophylaxis was associated with increased risk of repeated neurosurgery. These findings suggest that although timely initiation of prophylaxis should be prioritized, caution should be used particularly during the first 3 days after the index procedure, when this risk appears to be highest.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Massive thromboembolism complications associated with transient lupic anticoagulant acquired after traumatic brain injury
    Picard, W.
    Bonneil, P.
    Boin, V.
    Descamps, F.
    Drault, J. N.
    Volatron, A. C.
    Aye, P.
    Badia, P.
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2010, 29 (09): : 664 - 666
  • [32] Normalization of coagulation after traumatic brain injury: When to initiate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis
    Ligh, Cassandra A.
    Xing, Fangfang
    Kornblith, Lucy Z.
    Redick, Brittney J.
    Nelson, Mary
    Inoue, Tomoo
    Manley, Geoffrey T.
    Cohen, Mitchell J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (03) : S50 - S50
  • [33] Association for Academic Surgery National Analysis of Outcomes for Adult Trauma Patients With Isolated Severe Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury Following Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
    Elkbuli, Adel
    Watts, Emelia
    Patel, Heli
    Chin, Brian
    Wright, D-Dre
    Inouye, Marissa
    Nunez, Denise
    Rhodes, Heather X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 300 : 165 - 172
  • [34] Prediction of neurosurgical intervention after mild traumatic brain injury using the national trauma data bank
    Sweeney, Timothy E.
    Salles, Arghavan
    Harris, Odette A.
    Spain, David A.
    Staudenmayer, Kristan L.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2015, 10
  • [35] Prediction of neurosurgical intervention after mild traumatic brain injury using the national trauma data bank
    Timothy E. Sweeney
    Arghavan Salles
    Odette A. Harris
    David A. Spain
    Kristan L. Staudenmayer
    [J]. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 10
  • [36] The risk factors, outcomes, and costs associated with venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury: a nationwide analysis
    Hoffman, Haydn
    Jalal, Muhammad S.
    Chin, Lawrence S.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2019, 33 (13-14) : 1671 - 1678
  • [37] Chemical venous thromboembolic prophylaxis is safe and effective for patients with traumatic brain injury when started 24 hours after the absence of hemorrhage progression on head CT
    Saadeh, Yamaan
    Gohil, Kartik
    Bill, Charles
    Smith, Curtis
    Morrison, Chet
    Mosher, Benjamin
    Schneider, Paul
    Stevens, Penny
    Kepros, John P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 (02): : 426 - 430
  • [38] Anticoagulant prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism following severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective observational study and systematic review of the literature
    Hachem, Laureen D.
    Mansouri, Alireza
    Scales, Damon C.
    Geerts, William
    Pirouzmand, Farhad
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 175 : 68 - 73
  • [39] Machine learning-based models to predict the need for neurosurgical intervention after moderate traumatic brain injury
    Habibzadeh, Adrina
    Khademolhosseini, Sepehr
    Kouhpayeh, Amin
    Niakan, Amin
    Asadi, Mohammad Ali
    Ghasemi, Hadis
    Tabrizi, Reza
    Taheri, Reza
    Khalili, Hossein Ali
    [J]. HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (11)
  • [40] Delayed prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin increases the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective analysis
    Brandi, Giovanna
    Schmidlin, Adrian
    Klinzing, Stephanie
    Schupbach, Reto
    Unseld, Simone
    Pagnamenta, Alberto
    [J]. ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2020, 52 (01) : 28 - 33