Exchange of β-blockers in heart failure patients.: Experiences from the poststudy phase of COMET (the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)

被引:29
|
作者
Di Lenarda, A
Remme, WJ
Charlesworth, A
Cleland, JGF
Lutiger, B
Metra, M
Komajda, M
Torp-Pedersen, C
Scherhag, A
Swedberg, K
Poole-Wilson, PA
机构
[1] Osped Cattinara, Dept Cardiol, I-34100 Trieste, Italy
[2] Sticares Cardiovasc Res Fdn, Rhoon, Netherlands
[3] Stat Nottingham Clin Res Grp, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Hull, Dept Cardiol, Kingston Upon Hull, Yorks, England
[5] F Hoffmann La Roche & Co Ltd, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[6] Univ Brescia, Cattedra Cardiol, Brescia, Italy
[7] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Cardiol, Paris, France
[8] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[10] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
关键词
heart failure; beta-blockers; carvedilol; metoprolol; dosage; adverse event;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.09.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) reported a significant survival benefit for carvedilol, a beta 1-, beta 2- and alpha 1-blocker, vs. metoprolol tartrate, a beta 1-selective blocker, in patients with mild-to-severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Patients on treatment with metoprolol might benefit front switching to carvedilol. Aim: To investigate the safety and tolerability of switching beta-blockers in CHF. Methods: At the end of COMET, the Steering Committee recommended that study medication was stopped without unblinding, and patients were commenced on open-label beta-blockade at a dose equivalent to half the dose of blinded therapy, with subsequent titration to target or maximum tolerated dose. Patients were followed for 30 days. Results: 1321 out of 1440 patients were transitioned to open-label treatment (76.8% to carvedilol). Serious adverse and CHF-related events were respectively 9.4% and 4.7% in those switching from carvedilol to metoprolol and 3.1% and 1.5% in patients switching from metoprolol to carvedilol. Patients who switched from carvedilol to metoprolol showed the highest mortality or hospitalisation rate (12.3%) in comparison with those who switched from metoprolol to carvedilol (3.1%, p < 0.001) or who stayed on the same drug (carvedilol: 2.5%, p < 0.001; metoprolol: 4.2%, p = 0.04). Reducing the initial dose of the second beta-blocker maximised the safety of this strategy. Event rate was higher in patients with more severe heart failure and in those withdrawing from beta-blockade. Conclusion: Our data show that switching beta-blockers is a practical, safe and well-tolerated strategy to optimise treatment of CHF. Patients who switched to carvedilol showed the lowest rate of adverse events. A closer clinical monitoring is recommended during transition in high-risk patients. (c) 2004 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 649
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] β-Receptor Selectivity of Carvedilol and Metoprolol Succinate in Patients with Heart Failure (SELECT Trial): A Randomized Dose-Ranging Trial
    Zebrack, James S.
    Munger, Mark
    MacGregor, John
    Lombardi, William L.
    Stoddard, Gregory R.
    Gilbert, Edward M.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 29 (08): : 883 - 890
  • [23] Consistent survival benefit of carvedilol over metoprolol irrespective of baseline characteristics of heart failure patients - mode of death evaluation in COMET
    Remme, W
    Cleland, J
    DiLenarda, A
    Torp-Pedersen, C
    Metral, M
    Charlesworth, A
    Lutiger, B
    Poole-Wilson, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 486 - 486
  • [24] Consistent survival benefit of carvedilol over metoprolol irrespective of baseline characteristics of heart failure patients - Mode of death evaluation in COMET
    Remme, WJ
    Cleland, JG
    Torp-Pederson, C
    Metra, M
    Charlesworth, A
    Lutiger, B
    Poole-Wilson, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 155A - 155A
  • [25] Consistent survival benefit of carvedilol over metoprolol irrespective of baseline characteristics of heart failure patients - Mode of death evaluation in COMET
    Remme, WJ
    Cleland, JG
    Di Lenarda, A
    Torp-Pederson, C
    Metra, M
    Charlesworth, A
    Lutiger, B
    Poole-Wilson, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2004, 10 (04) : S84 - S84
  • [26] Metoprolol CR/XL in black patients with Heart Failure (from the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention trial in chronic heart failure)
    Goldstein, S
    Deedwania, P
    Gottlieb, S
    Wikstrand, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (04): : 478 - 480
  • [27] Differential effects of β-blockers in patients with heart failure -: A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the long-term effects of metoprolol versus carvedilol
    Metra, M
    Giubbini, R
    Nodari, S
    Boldi, E
    Modena, MG
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (05) : 546 - 551
  • [28] Importance of atrial fibrillation in chronic heart failure in patients treated with β-blockers.: Results from COMET
    Swedberg, K
    Olsson, L
    Hanrath, P
    Charlesworth, A
    Cleland, JG
    Di Lenarda, A
    Poole-Wilson, PA
    Torp-Pedersen, C
    Remme, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2004, 10 (04) : S85 - S85
  • [29] Importance of atrial fibrillation in chronic heart failure in patients treated with beta-blockers. Results from COMET
    Swedberg, CK
    Olsson, L
    Hanrath, P
    Charlesworth, A
    Cleland, J
    Di Lenarda, A
    Scherhag, A
    Poole-Wilson, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 582 - 582
  • [30] WHICH BETA BLOCKER RESTORES LEFT VENTRICULAR SYNCHRONISATION BETTER? A RANDOMISED TRIAL OF CARVEDILOL AND METOPROLOL IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY AND HEART FAILURE
    Kaya, Mehmet
    Sarli, Bahadir
    Lam, Yat Y.
    Kaya, Esma G.
    Dogan, Ali
    Inanc, Tugrul
    Gunebakmaz, Ozgur
    Yarlioglues, Mikail
    Kalay, Nihat
    Topsakal, Ramazan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)