Body size, biomic specialization and range size of African large mammals

被引:52
|
作者
Fernández, MH
Vrba, ES
机构
[1] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Dept Paleobiol, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Geol, Dept Palaeontol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, Kline Geol Lab, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Africa; bioclimatology; biogeography; biome; comparative analysis; ecological pattern; ecological specialization; macroecology; Mammalia;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01270.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim The goal of this paper is to examine the relationships between body size, biomic specialization and range size in the African large mammals, which are defined as all the African species corresponding to the orders Primates, Carnivora, Proboscidea, Perissodactyla, Hyracoidea, Tubulidentata, Artiodactyla and Pholidota. Location The study used the large mammal assemblage from Africa. Methods The degree of biomic specialization of African large mammals is investigated using the biomic specialization index (BSI) for each mammal species, based on the number of biomes it inhabits. Range size for each species is measured as the latitudinal extent of the geographical distribution of the species. We have analysed our data using both conventional cross-species analyses and phylogenetically independent contrasts. Results There is a polygonal relationship between species biomic specialization and body size. While small and large species are biomic specialists, medium-sized species are distributed along the whole range of biomic specialization. The latitudinal extent-body size relationship is approximately triangular. Small-bodied species may have either large or small ranges, whereas large-bodied ones have only large ranges. A positive correlation between latitudinal extent and biomic specialization is evident, although their relationship is better described as triangular. Main conclusions We found a polygonal relationship between species biomic specialization and body size, which agrees with previous arguments that small-bodied species have more limited dispersal and, therefore, they may come to occupy a lesser proportion of their potential inhabitable biomes. On the other hand, large-bodied species are constrained to inhabit biomes with a high productivity. A polygonal relationship between species latitudinal extent and body size in African large mammals agrees with previous studies of the relationship between range size and body size in other continents. The independent study of the macroecological pattern in biomic specialization highlights different factors that influence the body size-range size relationship. Although body size is usually implicated as a correlate of both specialization and geographical range size in large mammals, much of the variation in these variables cannot be attributed to size differences but to biome specific factors such as productivity, area, history, etc.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors affecting intraspecific variation in home range size of a large African herbivore
    Robin Naidoo
    Pierre Du Preez
    Greg Stuart-Hill
    L. Chris Weaver
    Mark Jago
    Martin Wegmann
    Landscape Ecology, 2012, 27 : 1523 - 1534
  • [42] Factors affecting intraspecific variation in home range size of a large African herbivore
    Naidoo, Robin
    Du Preez, Pierre
    Stuart-Hill, Greg
    Weaver, L. Chris
    Jago, Mark
    Wegmann, Martin
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2012, 27 (10) : 1523 - 1534
  • [43] Conservation implications of geographic range size body size relationships
    Gaston, KJ
    Blackburn, TM
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (02) : 638 - 646
  • [44] Range size body size relationships: Evidence of scale dependence
    Gaston, KJ
    Blackburn, TM
    OIKOS, 1996, 75 (03) : 479 - 485
  • [45] VARIATION IN GEOGRAPHICAL RANGE SIZE AMONG MAMMALS OF THE PALEARCTIC
    LETCHER, AJ
    HARVEY, PH
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (01): : 30 - 42
  • [46] Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size
    Bowman, J
    Jaeger, JAG
    Fahrig, L
    ECOLOGY, 2002, 83 (07) : 2049 - 2055
  • [47] Body mass as a predictive variable of home-range size among Italian mammals and birds
    Ottaviani, D.
    Cairns, S. C.
    Oliverio, M.
    Boitani, L.
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2006, 269 (03) : 317 - 330
  • [48] The Importance of Body Size in Diving Mammals: Small Marine Mammals Compensate
    Costa, D. P.
    Huckstadt, L. A.
    Villegas-Amtmann, S.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 58 : E44 - E44
  • [49] THE EVOLUTION OF BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS ON ISLANDS - SOME COMMENTS
    ANGERBJORN, A
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1985, 125 (02): : 304 - 309
  • [50] Diversity in relation to body size in mammals: A comparative study
    Gardezi, T
    da Silva, J
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 153 (01): : 110 - 123