Conditioned taste aversion as a learning and memory paradigm

被引:165
|
作者
Welzl, H [1 ]
D'Adamo, P
Lipp, HP
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Anat, Div Neuroanat & Behav, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] IGBE, CNR, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
transgenic mice; knockout; method; behavioral phenotyping;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00302-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is a well established learning and memory paradigm in rats and mice that is considered to be a special form of classical conditioning. Rodents - as well as many other species including man - learn to associate a novel taste (CS) with nausea (US), and as a consequence avoid drinking fluid with this specific taste. In contrast to other types of classical conditioning, even CS-US intervals lasting several hours lead to an aversion to the gustatory CS. With increasing CS-US delay duration. however. the aversion against the CS gradually decreases. Mice differ from rats in their reaction to the CS as well as the US. They tolerate a much higher concentration of saccharin and they do not show any clear signs of nausea when injected with the US. Advantages of this task are its relative independence of motor behavior, well described pathways for the CS and partly the US, and the wealth of available anatomical and pharmacological data implying several brain structures (e.g. parabrachial nucleus, amygdala, insular cortex), neurotransmitters and their receptors (e.g. cholinergic system, NMDA-receptors), and cellular processes (e.g. expression of immediate early genes, Ras-MAP kinase signaling pathway, CREB phosphorilation, protein tyrosine phosphorilation, protein synthesis) in CTA. The CTA paradigm has also been successfully used to phenotype mouse mutants. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 213
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in conditioned taste aversion learning
    Simonyi, A.
    Serfozo, P.
    Parker, K. E.
    Ramsey, A. K.
    Schachtman, T. R.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2009, 92 (03) : 460 - 463
  • [32] Effects of midazolam on acquisition and extinction of conditioned taste aversion memory in rats
    Ishitobi, Shingo
    Ayuse, Takao
    Yoshida, Harushi
    Oi, Kumiko
    Toda, Kazuo
    Miyamoto, Takenori
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 450 (03) : 270 - 274
  • [33] Characterization of taste sensitivities to amino acids and sugars by conditioned taste aversion learning in chickens
    Yoshida, Yuta
    Fujishiro, Shu
    Kawai, Ryota
    Kawabata, Fuminori
    ANIMAL, 2024, 18 (02)
  • [34] ACETALDEHYDE MAY MEDIATE REINFORCEMENT AND AVERSION PRODUCED BY ETHANOL - AN EXAMINATION USING A CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION PARADIGM
    ARAGON, CMG
    ABITBOL, M
    AMIT, Z
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 25 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [35] Application of the conditioned taste aversion paradigm to assess discriminative stimulus properties of psychostimulants in rats
    Awasaki, Yasuyuki
    Nojima, Hisae
    Nishida, Nobuyuki
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2011, 118 (2-3) : 288 - 294
  • [36] The delayed effects of phencyclidine (PCP) disrupt latent inhibition in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm
    Turgeon, SM
    Auerbach, EA
    Heller, MA
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 60 (02) : 553 - 558
  • [37] REINSTATEMENT OF LATENT INHIBITION FOLLOWING A REMINDER TREATMENT IN A CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION PARADIGM
    ACKIL, JK
    CARMAN, HM
    BAKNER, L
    RICCIO, DC
    BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1992, 58 (03): : 232 - 235
  • [38] Latent inhibition disruption by MK-801 in a conditioned taste-aversion paradigm
    Traverso, LM
    Ruiz, G
    De la Casa, LG
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2003, 80 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [39] DRUG DISCRIMINATION USING A CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION PARADIGM IN RHESUS-MONKEYS
    GLOWA, JR
    JEFFREYS, RD
    RILEY, AL
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1991, 56 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [40] Taste quality and extinction of a conditioned taste aversion in rats
    Rick A. Bevins
    Heather C. Jensen
    Todd S. Hinze
    Joyce Besheer
    Animal Learning & Behavior, 1999, 27 : 358 - 366