Mantle cell lymphoma - Current standards of care and future directions

被引:11
|
作者
Martin, Peter [1 ]
Ghione, Paola [2 ]
Dreyling, Martin [3 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Mol Biotechnol & Hlth Sci, Div Hematol, Turin, Italy
[3] Hosp Univ LMU Miinchen, Dept Med 3, Munich, Germany
关键词
Mantle cell lymphoma; Treatment; Chemotherapy; Transplant; Maintenance; Prognosis; HIGH-DOSE CYTARABINE; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; BENDAMUSTINE PLUS RITUXIMAB; RESIDUAL DISEASE DETECTION; MULTICENTER PHASE-II; 15-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; OPEN-LABEL; INVESTIGATORS CHOICE; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; INITIAL TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.05.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Over the past decade we have seen significant changes in the biological characterization and strategies for treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). MCL is heterogeneous a disease, and so are the people that have it; although guidelines are appropriate, therapeutic approaches must be individualized based on a variety of factors. In this review, we summarize data on the range of therapeutic options, from observation in patients with slowly progressive low-tumor-burden MCL, to bendamustine-based regimens in typical MCL, to high-dose cytarabine-based regimens in young, fit patients. The management of previously treated MCL is evolving with the availability of new agents and more changes are expected. Several recent and ongoing clinical trials have the potential to provide new options for patients and are discussed as future directions. Additionally, prognostic tools, measurement of minimal residual disease, and assessment of toxicity are already common research tools and may soon impact therapeutic strategies as a standard of care. Indeed, there has never been a time that management of MCL was as complicated while the promise for real improvements in outcomes is so great. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current and Emerging Therapies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
    L. Kyle Brett
    Michael E. Williams
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2013, 14 : 198 - 211
  • [32] Current therapeutic strategies for mantle cell lymphoma
    Dreyling, M.
    Schnaiter, A.
    Schmidt, C.
    Hoster, E.
    [J]. INTERNIST, 2016, 57 (03): : 230 - +
  • [33] Immunotherapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Current Landscape and Future Directions
    Modi, Dipenkumar
    Potugari, Bindu
    Uberti, Joseph
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [34] Current standards and future directions for prostate cancer radiation therapy
    Pinkawa, Michael
    Schoth, Felix
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Sharabi, Andrew
    Song, Danny
    Eble, Michael J.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [35] Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke: Current Standards and Future Directions
    Ramani L.
    Huang X.
    Cheripelli B.
    Muir K.W.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2015, 17 (4) : 1 - 14
  • [36] Molecular pathology of gastrointestinal tumors Current standards and future directions
    Bedau, Tillmann
    Quaas, Alexander
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2024, 19 (03): : 225 - 233
  • [37] Pancreatic cancer: current standards, research updates and future directions
    Hsueh, Chung-Tsen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 2 (03) : 123 - 125
  • [38] A new standard of care for mantle cell lymphoma?
    Rule, Simon
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01): : 5 - 6
  • [39] Precision therapy for lymphoma-current state and future directions
    Intlekofer, Andrew M.
    Younes, Anas
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 11 (10) : 585 - 596
  • [40] Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Current Knowledge and Future Directions
    Thieblemont, Catherine
    Davi, Frederic
    Noguera, Maria-Elena
    Briere, Josette
    Bertoni, Francesco
    Zucca, Emanuele
    Traverse-Glehen, Alexandra
    Felman, Pascale
    Berger, Francoise
    Salles, Gilles
    Coiffier, Bertrand
    [J]. ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2012, 26 (02): : 194 - 202