PERMETHRIN SPOT-ON INTOXICATION OF CATS Literature review and survey of veterinary practitioners in Australia

被引:23
|
作者
Malik, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Ward, Michael P. [3 ]
Seavers, Aine [4 ]
Fawcett, Anne [5 ]
Bell, Erin [6 ]
Govendir, Merran [2 ]
Page, Stephen [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Ctr Vet Educ, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
[4] Oak Flats Vet Clin, Oak Flats, NSW 2529, Australia
[5] Sydney Anim Hosp Inner W, Stanmore, NSW 2048, Australia
[6] Cat Clin, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[7] Adv Vet Therapeut, Berry, NSW 2535, Australia
关键词
TOXICITY; INFORMATION; PRODUCTS; PYRETHRIN; TOXICOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfms.2009.12.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Survey aims A questionnaire was sent to veterinarians in Australia to determine the approximate number of cats presenting for permethrin spot-on (PSO) intoxication over a 2-year period. Findings Of the 269 questionnaires returned, 255 were eligible for analysis. A total of 207 respondents (81%) reported cases of PSO intoxication in cats over the previous 2 years. In total, 750 individual cases were reported, with 166 deaths. While all deaths were generally attributable to intoxication, 39 cats were euthanased because owners were unable to pay the anticipated treatment costs. Brands of PSO implicated included Exelpet Flea (and Tick) Liquidator (Mars Australia) (1146 respondents), Bayer Advantix (48), Purina Totalcare Flea Eliminator Line-On (19), Troy Ease-On (six) and Duogard Line-On (Virbac) (four); 67 respondents were not able to identify a specific product. Permethrin spot-on formulations were most commonly obtained from supermarkets (146 respondents), followed by pet stores (43), veterinary practices (116), and a range of other sources including produce stores and friends. The majority of intoxication cases reported involved PSOs labelled for use in dogs with specific label instructions such as 'toxic to cats'. Owners applied these PSO products to their cats accidentally or intentionally. In some cases, exposure was through secondary contact, such as when a PSO product was applied to a dog with which a cat had direct or indirect contact. Recommendations In the authors' view, because of the likelihood of inappropriate use and toxicity in the non-labelled species, over-the-counter products intended for use in either dogs or cats must have a high margin of safety in all species. Furthermore, PSOs should only be available at points of sale where veterinary advice can be provided and appropriate warnings given. As an interim measure, modified labelling with more explicit warnings may reduce morbidity and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 14
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] Haemophilia and ageing. Promoting healthy ageing through proactive engagement with general practitioners - literature review and pilot survey
    Hollingdrake, O.
    Zeissink, B.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2015, 13 : 403 - 403
  • [22] Drug information resources used by nurse practitioners and collaborating physicians at the point of care in Nova Scotia, Canada: A survey and review of the literature
    Murphy A.L.
    Fleming M.
    Martin-Misener R.
    Sketris I.S.
    MacCara M.
    Gass D.
    BMC Nursing, 5 (1)
  • [23] Differences in Ethical Viewpoints among Civilian-Military Populations: A Survey among Practitioners in Two European Countries, Based on a Systematic Literature Review
    Khorram-Manesh, Amir
    Goniewicz, Krzysztof
    Phattharapornjaroen, Phatthranit
    Gray, Lesley
    Carlstrom, Eric
    Sundwall, Alice
    Hertelendy, Attila J.
    Burkle, Frederick M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)