Development of an e-mail database of US intensive care physicians

被引:10
|
作者
Halpern, Scott D. [1 ,2 ]
Hussen, Sophia A. [3 ]
Metkus, Thomas S. [3 ]
Ward, Nicholas S. [4 ]
Luce, John M. [5 ]
Curtis, J. Randall [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
health care surveys; electronic mail; criticial care; intensive care unit; hospitals; teaching; data collection;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.12.006
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although surveying critical care physicians regarding their behaviors and attitudes may usefully inform clinical, ethical, and policy questions, few resources exist for surveying intensivists electronically. We sought to develop an e-mail database for all intensivists associated with US training programs in critical care medicine (academic intensivists) and to determine the feasibility of using this database to survey intensivists. Materials and Methods: We obtained e-mail addresses for academic intensivists by consulting each training program's institutional Web site or contacting program directors directly. We sent presumed intensivists up to 3 e-mail invitations to participate in an initial survey. Results: We identified 2858 potential intensivists and obtained operative e-mail addresses for 2494 (87%). Only 31 (9%) of the remaining intensivists were members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, suggesting that most of those without identified addresses were not intensivists. During the conduct of an initial survey, 161 physicians self-identified themselves as nonintensivists; of the remaining 2333 presumed intensivists, 1026 (44%) responded and 44 (2%) opted out. The response rate of 44% is based on the conservative assumptions that the remaining 1263 physicians were intensivists and saw the e-mail invitation. Conclusions: This database provides a unique resource for investigators wishing to efficiently identify the views and practice patterns of US academic intensivists and provides a benchmark response rate of approximately 44% for electronic surveys of intensivists. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 31
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] E-mail
    Peter, J
    [J]. RECHERCHE, 1996, (290): : 6 - 6
  • [22] E-mail
    Schreiber, MH
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (07) : 453 - 453
  • [23] E-MAIL
    DUNCAN, E
    [J]. NEW REPUBLIC, 1993, 209 (16) : 4 - 4
  • [25] 'E-MAIL'
    DOUGLAS, L
    [J]. HUDSON REVIEW, 1994, 47 (03): : 361 - 376
  • [26] Use of an E-mail curbside consultation service by family physicians
    Bergus, GR
    Sinift, SD
    Randall, CS
    Rosenthal, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 47 (05): : 357 - 360
  • [27] Experiences of physicians who frequently use e-mail with patients
    Houston, TK
    Sands, DZ
    Nash, BR
    Ford, DE
    [J]. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2003, 15 (04) : 515 - 525
  • [28] E-mail
    张更新
    [J]. 电信科学, 1996, (10) : 63 - 63
  • [29] (e-mail:)
    Xia, Weidai
    Zhou, Dongming
    Cao, Jinde
    Liu, Yanyu
    Hou, Ruichao
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 493 : 327 - 339
  • [30] E-mail
    Zoller, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 127 (11): : 1576 - 1576