Optimisation of the surfboard fin shape using computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithms

被引:16
|
作者
Sakellariou, Konstantinos [1 ]
Rana, Zeeshan A. [1 ]
Jenkins, Karl W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Aerosp Transport & Mfg, Coll Rd, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
Genetic algorithm; computational fluid dynamics; response surface based model; Latin hypercube sampling; optimisation; surfboard fin; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1754337117704538
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
During the sport of wave surfing, the fins on a surfboard play a major role in the overall performance of the surfer. This article presents the optimisation of a surfboard fin shape, using coupled genetic algorithms with the FLUENT (R) solver, aiming at the maximisation of the lift per drag ratio. The design-variable vector includes six components namely the chord length, the depth and the sweep angle of the fin as well as the maximum camber, the maximum camber position and the thickness of the hydrofoil (the four-digit NACA parametrization). The Latin hypercube sampling technique is utilised to explore the design space, resulting in 42 different fin designs. Fin and control volume models are created (using CATIA((R)) V5) and meshed (unstructured using ANSYS((R)) Workbench). Steady-state computations were performed using the FLUENT SST k- (shear stress transport k-) turbulence model at the velocity of 10m/s and 10 degrees angle of attack. Using the obtained lift and drag values, a response surface based model was constructed with the aim to maximise the lift-to-drag ratio. The optimisation problem was solved using the genetic algorithm provided by the MATLAB((R)) optimisation toolbox and the response surface based model was iteratively improved. The resultant optimal fin design is compared with the experimental data for the fin demonstrating an increase in lift-to-drag ratio by approximately 62% for the given angle of attack of 10 degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 354
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Suite of Computationally Expensive Shape Optimisation Problems Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Daniels, Steven J.
    Rahat, Alma A. M.
    Everson, Richard M.
    Tabor, Gavin R.
    Fieldsend, Jonathan E.
    [J]. PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN XV, PT II, 2018, 11102 : 296 - 307
  • [2] Multipoint shape optimisation of an automotive radial compressor using a coupled computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithm approach
    Tuchler, Stefan
    Chen, Zhihang
    Copeland, Colin D.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 165 : 543 - 561
  • [3] DESIGN OPTIMISATION USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
    Green, Johnathan
    [J]. Naval Architect, 2023, : 50 - 53
  • [4] Computational optimisation of cancer chemotherapies using genetic algorithms
    Petrovski, A
    McCall, J
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, : 117 - +
  • [5] Shape optimization of water-to-water plate-fin heat exchanger using computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithm
    Yin, Hang
    Ooka, Ryozo
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 80 : 310 - 318
  • [6] Aerodynamic shape optimization using computational fluid dynamics and parallel simulated annealing algorithms
    Wang, X
    Damodaran, M
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2001, 39 (08) : 1500 - 1508
  • [7] Optimisation of shape and process parameters in metal forging using genetic algorithms
    Castro, CF
    António, CAC
    Sousa, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 146 (03) : 356 - 364
  • [8] Two-dimensional road shape optimisation using genetic algorithms
    Liatsis, P
    Tawfik, HM
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1999, 51 (1-2) : 19 - 31
  • [9] Shape optimisation of the sharp-heeled Kaplan draft tube: Performance evaluation using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Daniels, S. J.
    Rahat, A. A. M.
    Tabor, G. R.
    Fieldsend, J. E.
    Everson, R. M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 160 (160) : 112 - 126
  • [10] Multiobjective optimisation of fluid catalytic cracker unit using genetic algorithms
    Dave, D
    Nan, Z
    [J]. EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING - 13, 2003, 14 : 623 - 628