Panitumumab In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Wild-Type KRAS

被引:19
|
作者
Weber, Juliane
McCormack, Paul L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wolters Kluwer Hlth Adis, Auckland 0754, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.2165/0063030-200822060-00006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Panitumumab is a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that is highly selective for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is overexpressed in 25-77% of colorectal cancers and is often associated with a poor prognosis. Binding of panitumumab to EGFR reduces cell proliferation and mediator production, and induces apoptosis. In a comparative, phase III trial in adult patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, intravenous panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus best supportive care (BSC) improved progression-free survival (PFS) [primary endpoint] and objective tumor response rate to a significantly greater extent than BSC alone. The improvement in PFS produced by panitumumab monotherapy was significantly greater in patients with non-mutated (wild-type). KRAS than in those with mutant KRAS (in whom no benefit from panitumumab was observed). Similarly, all patients experiencing a partial response had wild-type KRAS, while stable disease was achieved by more patients with wild-type KRAS than with mutant KRAS. The predictive value of mutant KRAS for a lack of clinical benefit with panitumumab monotherapy was supported by results from an open-label extension of the phase III study and a large phase H study. Although most patients treated with panitumumab experienced at least one adverse event, the incidence of severe adverse events resulting in discontinuation of treatment was relatively low. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were skin-related toxicities, which reflect the mechanism of action of panitumumab.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 411
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A phase I/II study of decitabine in combination with panitumumab in patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer
    Garrido-Laguna, I.
    McGregor, K. A.
    Wade, M.
    Weis, J.
    Gilcrease, W.
    Burr, L.
    Soldi, R.
    Jakubowski, L.
    Davidson, C.
    Morrell, G.
    Olpin, J. D.
    Boucher, K.
    Jones, D.
    Sharma, S.
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2013, 31 (05) : 1257 - 1264
  • [22] A phase I/II study of decitabine in combination with panitumumab in patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer
    I. Garrido-Laguna
    K. A. McGregor
    M. Wade
    J. Weis
    W. Gilcrease
    L. Burr
    R. Soldi
    L. Jakubowski
    C. Davidson
    G. Morrell
    J. D. Olpin
    K. Boucher
    D. Jones
    S. Sharma
    Investigational New Drugs, 2013, 31 : 1257 - 1264
  • [23] Clinical benefit rate (CBR) of panitumumab monotherapy among patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
    Kennecke, Hagen F.
    Lim, Howard John
    Johal, Balvindar Singh
    Zulfiqar, Muhammad
    Speers, Caroline
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [24] A comparison of panitumumab and cetuximab in the treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Tong
    Jiang, Shuai
    Teng, Xue
    Zhong, Lu
    Liu, Mengmeng
    Jin, Yao
    Dong, Mei
    IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY, 2023, 45 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [25] PANITUMUMAB AFTER PROGRESSION ON CETUXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH KRAS WILD-TYPE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER (MCRC): A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
    Marino, Antonella
    Caliolo, Chiara
    Sponziello, Francesco
    Nacci, Angelo
    Quaranta, Annamaria
    Mazzoni, Enrica
    Rizzo, Pietro
    Calvani, Nicola
    Orlando, Laura
    Schiavone, Paola
    Fedele, Palma
    D'Amico, Maria
    Cinefra, Margherita
    Cinieri, Saverio
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 95 - 96
  • [26] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PANITUMUMAB VERSUS CETUXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH CHEMO-REFRACTORY WILD-TYPE KRAS METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER
    Xu, Y.
    Hay, J. W.
    Barzi, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A2 - A2
  • [27] Randomized Phase Ib/II Trial of Rilotumumab or Ganitumab with Panitumumab versus Panitumumab Alone in Patients with Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Eng, Cathy
    Nowara, Elzbieta
    Swieboda-Sadlej, Anna
    Tebbutt, Niall C.
    Mitchell, Edith
    Davidenko, Irina
    Stephenson, Joe
    Elez, Elena
    Prenen, Hans
    Deng, Hongjie
    Tang, Rui
    McCaffery, Ian
    Oliner, Kelly S.
    Chen, Lisa
    Gansert, Jennifer
    Loh, Elwyn
    Smethurst, Dominic
    Tabernero, Josep
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (16) : 4240 - 4250
  • [28] CANADIAN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BEVACIZUMAB, CETUXIMAB, AND PANITUMUMAB IN THE FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF KRAS WILD-TYPE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER (MCRC)
    Lawrence, D.
    Maschio, M.
    Yunger, S.
    Easaw, J.
    Aucoin, N.
    Weinstein, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 202 - 202
  • [29] Panitumumab monotherapy compared with cetuximab and irinotecan combination therapy in patients with previously treated KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Kennecke, H.
    Chen, L.
    Blanke, C. D.
    Cheung, W. Y.
    Schaff, K.
    Speers, C.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : 326 - 332
  • [30] Clinical outcome of panitumumab for metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS status: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M.
    Abouelkhair, Khaled M.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 28 : S310 - S317