Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage

被引:109
|
作者
Schmidt, Hans-Peter [1 ]
Anca-Couce, Andres [2 ]
Hagemann, Nikolas [1 ,3 ]
Werner, Constanze [4 ]
Gerten, Dieter [4 ,5 ]
Lucht, Wolfgang [4 ,5 ]
Kammann, Claudia [6 ]
机构
[1] Ithaka Inst, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Thermal Engn, Graz, Austria
[3] Agroscope, Environm Analyt, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Res Domain I Earth Syst Anal, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Berlin, Germany
[6] Hsch Geisenheim Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, Geisenheim, Germany
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
biochar; bio-oil; carbon sequestration; climate mitigation; permanent pyrogas; pyrolysis; tCDR; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; LOW-TEMPERATURE PYROLYSIS; INCLUDING VINEGAR LIQUID; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; BLACK CARBON; SEQUESTERING CARBON; BAMBOO CHARCOAL; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; BIOCHAR APPLICATION; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12553
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The growth of biomass is considered the most efficient method currently available to extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, biomass carbon is easily degraded by microorganisms releasing it in the form of greenhouse gases back to the atmosphere. If biomass is pyrolyzed, the organic carbon is converted into solid (biochar), liquid (bio-oil), and gaseous (permanent pyrogas) carbonaceous products. During the last decade, biochar has been discussed as a promising option to improve soil fertility and sequester carbon, although the carbon efficiency of the thermal conversion of biomass into biochar is in the range of 30%-50% only. So far, the liquid and gaseous pyrolysis products were mainly considered for combustion, though they can equally be processed into recalcitrant forms suitable for carbon sequestration. In this review, we show that pyrolytic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS) can aspire for carbon sequestration efficiencies of >70%, which is shown to be an important threshold to allow PyCCS to become a relevant negative emission technology. Prolonged residence times of pyrogenic carbon can be generated (a) within the terrestrial biosphere including the agricultural use of biochar; (b) within advanced bio-based materials as long as they are not oxidized (biochar, bio-oil); and (c) within suitable geological deposits (bio-oil and CO2 from permanent pyrogas oxidation). While pathway (c) would need major carbon taxes or similar governmental incentives to become a realistic option, pathways (a) and (b) create added economic value and could at least partly be implemented without other financial incentives. Pyrolysis technology is already well established, biochar sequestration and bio-oil sequestration in soils, respectively biomaterials, do not present ecological hazards, and global scale-up appears feasible within a time frame of 10-30 years. Thus, PyCCS could evolve into a decisive tool for global carbon governance, serving climate change mitigation and the sustainable development goals simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 591
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon capture and storage
    Green Energy and Technology, 2014, 175 : 349 - 393
  • [2] Carbon capture and storage
    OPEC Bull., 2008, 6 (20-23):
  • [3] Carbon Capture and Storage
    Forbes, Sarah M.
    Benson, Sally M.
    Friedmann, S. Julio
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (16): : 1601 - 1601
  • [4] Carbon capture and storage
    Gibbins, Jon
    Chalmers, Hannah
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) : 4317 - 4322
  • [5] Carbon Capture and Storage
    1600, Springer Verlag (03):
  • [6] Carbon capture and storage
    Marshall, Rebekkah
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 115 (05) : 28 - +
  • [7] Pyrogenic Carbon Contributes Substantially to Carbon Storage in Intact and Degraded Northern Peatlands
    Leifeld, Jens
    Alewell, Christine
    Bader, Cedric
    Krueger, Jan Paul
    Mueller, Carsten W.
    Sommer, Michael
    Steffens, Markus
    Szidat, Sonke
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 29 (07) : 2082 - 2091
  • [8] Is There a Future for Carbon Capture and Storage?
    Ekeland, Anders
    Kang, Rong
    Kovarnik, Jaroslav
    Hamplova, Eva
    HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 11(1), 2021, 11 : 168 - 175
  • [9] Carbon dioxide capture and storage
    Benson, Sally M.
    Orr, Franklin M., Jr.
    MRS BULLETIN, 2008, 33 (04) : 303 - 305
  • [10] Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
    Yan, Jinyue
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 148 : A1 - A6