THE COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D DETECTORS FOR TLS DATA REGISTRATION - PRELIMINARY RESULTS

被引:1
|
作者
Markiewicz, J. S. [1 ]
Markiewicz, L. [2 ]
Forys, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Geodesy & Cartog, Dept Photogrammetry Remote Sensing & Spatial Info, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Mechatron, Inst Micromech & Photon, Virtual Real Tech Div, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
cultural heritage; TLS data registration; feature-based method; 2D and 3D detectors; accuracy analysis; AUTOMATIC REGISTRATION;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-467-2019
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper presents the analysis of possible methods of a terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data registration using 2D/3D detectors and descriptors. The developed approach, where point clouds are processed in form of panoramic images, orthoimages and 3D data, was described. The accuracy of the registration process was preliminary verified. The two approaches were analysed and compared: the 2D SIFT (Scale-Invariant Feature Transform) detector and descriptor with the rasterized TLS data and the 3D SIFT detector with the 3D FPFH (Fast Point Feature Histograms) descriptor. The feature points were found and preliminary matched using the OpenCV and PCL (Point Cloud Library) libraries. In order to find the best point cloud representation for the registration process, both the percentage and distribution of the correctly detected and matched points were analysed. The materials consisted of the point clouds of two chambers from the Museum of King John III's Palace in Wilanow. They were acquired using the Z+F 5006h and 5003 TLS scanners. The performed analysis showed that the lowest RMSE values were for the 2D detectors and orthoimages. However, in the case of the point number and distribution, better results were obtained for using the 3D detector.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 472
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Registration Using Nanotube Stationary Tomosynthesis: Comparison of 3D/3D to 3D/2D Methods
    Frederick, B.
    Lalush, D.
    Chang, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [2] 2D/3D registration of endoscopic ultrasound to CT volume data
    Hummel, Johann
    Figl, Michael
    Bax, Michael
    Bergmann, Helmar
    Birkfellner, Wolfgang
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (16): : 4303 - 4316
  • [3] Detectors for 2D or 3D dosimetry measurements
    Ibbott, GS
    [J]. GENERAL PRACTICE OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, (26): : 329 - 356
  • [4] 2D/3D registration of multiple bones
    Ma, Burton
    Stewart, James
    Pichora, David
    Ellis, Randy
    Abolmaesumi, Purang
    [J]. 2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 860 - 863
  • [5] Deep Iterative 2D/3D Registration
    Jaganathan, Srikrishna
    Wang, Jian
    Borsdorf, Anja
    Shetty, Karthik
    Maier, Andreas
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2021, PT IV, 2021, 12904 : 383 - 392
  • [6] Evaluating 2D/3D registration accuracy
    LaRose, D
    Bayouth, J
    Kanade, T
    [J]. CARS 2000: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2000, 1214 : 147 - 152
  • [7] Elastic 3D–2D Image Registration
    Paul Striewski
    Benedikt Wirth
    [J]. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2022, 64 : 443 - 462
  • [8] 2D/3D image registration on the GPU
    Kubias A.
    Deinzer F.
    Feldmann T.
    Paulus D.
    Schreiber B.
    Brunner Th.
    [J]. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2008, 18 (3) : 381 - 389
  • [9] Preliminary 2D and 3D Gamma Calculation Comparison Using PRESAGE
    Lafratta, R.
    Yang, J.
    Sahoo, N.
    Tucker, S.
    Followill, D.
    Ibbott, G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 350 - 350
  • [10] A novel intrarenal multimodal 2D/3D registration algorithm and preliminary phantom study
    Fu, Zuoming
    Jin, Ziyi
    Zhang, Chongan
    Wang, Peng
    Zhang, Hong
    Ye, Xuesong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (08):