Impact of Ph.D. training: a comprehensive analysis based on a Japanese national doctoral survey

被引:16
|
作者
Shibayama, Sotaro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kobayashi, Yoshie [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Sten K Johnson Ctr Entrepreneurship, POB 7080, S-22007 Lund, Sweden
[2] Natl Inst Sci & Technol Policy, Minist Educ Culture Sports Sci & Technol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Ph.D; training; Academic training; Higher education; Postgraduate education; Academic career; RESEARCH SUPERVISION; MINOR UNIVERSITIES; PHD STUDENTS; SCIENTISTS; SCIENCE; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-017-2479-7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Ph.D. training in academic labs offers the foundation for the production of knowledge workers, indispensable for the modern knowledge-based society. Nonetheless, our understanding on Ph.D. training has been insufficient due to limited access to the inside of academic labs. Furthermore, early careers of Ph.D. graduates are often difficult to follow, which makes the evaluation of training effects challenging. To address these limitations, this study aims to illustrate the settings of Ph.D. training in academic labs and examine their impact on several training outcomes, drawing on a national survey of a cohort of 5000 Ph.D. graduates from Japanese universities. The result suggests that a supervising team structure as well as the frequency of supervision, contingent to a few contextual factors, determine the Ph.D. graduates' career decisions, performance, and degrees of satisfaction with the training programs.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 415
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Training STEM Ph.D. Students to Deal with Moral Dilemmas
    Rashid, Rafi
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2020, 26 (03) : 1861 - 1872
  • [22] Analysis of nanostructured materials Ph.D. course
    Weiss, Z
    Wyslych, P
    Krístková, M
    Havlová, D
    Capková, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2002, 18 (05) : 532 - 538
  • [23] Teacher Training for Ph.D. Students: Recommendations for Content and Delivery
    Bergner, Jason
    Lin, Ling
    Tepalagui, Nopmanee Kong
    [J]. E-JOURNAL OF BUSINESS EDUCATION & SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING, 2015, 9 (01):
  • [24] An analysis of Ph.D. examiners' reports in engineering
    Prieto, Elena
    Holbrook, Allyson
    Bourke, Sid
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (02) : 192 - 203
  • [25] The ideal of teacher training within the reality of the Ph.D. program
    Houston, GW
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, VOL 132, 2002, 132 (1-2): : 191 - 197
  • [26] Dataset from a qualitative survey on Ph.D. entrepreneurship in Italy
    Muscio, Alessandro
    Ramaciotti, Laura
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 18 : 1272 - 1276
  • [27] GRADUATE TRAINING Ph.D. programs drop standardized exam
    Langin, Katie
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2019, 364 (6443) : 816 - 816
  • [28] Training STEM Ph.D. Students to Deal with Moral Dilemmas
    Rafi Rashid
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26 : 1861 - 1872
  • [29] Mentor relationships in clinical psychology doctoral training: Results of a national survey
    Clark, RA
    Harden, SL
    Johnson, WB
    [J]. TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 27 (04) : 262 - 268
  • [30] Designing and building dedicated Ph.D. courses contributing to international EU mobility at doctoral level
    Bossier, Peter
    Eleftheriou, Margaret
    [J]. AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 23 (03) : 727 - 749