Economic viability of private commons: Framework and guidelines for profitability

被引:3
|
作者
Al Daoud, Ashraf [1 ]
Alanyali, Murat [2 ]
Starobinski, David [2 ]
机构
[1] German Jordanian Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Amman, Jordan
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Secondary spectrum access; Private commons; Pricing;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2012.06.011
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Ongoing regulatory reforms have led to several novel spectrum sharing models under the general umbrella of dynamic spectrum sharing. The private commons model introduced by FCC in 2004 allows spectrum licensees to provide secondary access to spectrum on an opportunistic basis while retaining ownership. Since wireless communication systems are typically overprovisioned in order to deliver service-level guarantees to (primary) users under short-term load variations, this model bears significant potential by facilitating utilization of temporal and spatial surplus of capacity through serving secondary users at possibly different service levels. A potential barrier to adoption of the private commons model is the uncertainty about secondary price-demand relationship which is difficult to predict in an emerging market: A selected price for secondary access may be profitable for some values of secondary demand but not for others, leading to a profound uncertainty about ultimate benefit of spectrum sharing. This paper aims to eliminate such an uncertainty by devising concrete guidelines and methods for profitability. The paper establishes that the price of secondary spectrum access can be chosen to guarantee profitability for any value of secondary demand: It is shown that for both the coordinated and uncoordinated commons regimes a profitable price should exceed a threshold value, which can be calculated. Hence profitability of private commons is insensitive to the demand function. This observation has two complementary interpretations: From a business perspective it provides a constructive approach to profitability: and from a regulatory perspective it provides reassurance that private commons is a healthy model. The paper also leverages the insensitivity property and outlines a technique to further enhance revenue via iterative spectrum offerings. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 240
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMMONS,JR LEGAL ECONOMIC THEORY
    GONCE, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 1971, 5 (03) : 80 - 95
  • [42] An Economic Dynamic approach to the infrastructure commons
    Driesen, David M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY, 2008, 35 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [43] Innovation Commons: The Origin of Economic Growth
    Dekker, Erwin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 44 (04) : 661 - 664
  • [44] Guidelines for cell viability assays
    Kamiloglu, Senem
    Sari, Gulce
    Ozdal, Tugba
    Capanoglu, Esra
    [J]. FOOD FRONTIERS, 2020, 1 (03): : 332 - 349
  • [45] Water: a commons beyond economic value
    Venot, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. NATURE, 2023, 618 (7966) : 675 - 675
  • [46] Water: a commons beyond economic value
    Jean-Philippe Venot
    [J]. Nature, 2023, 618 : 675 - 675
  • [47] Identity, Commons and Sustainability: An Economic Perspective
    Setti, Marco
    Garuti, Matteo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [48] Model-based optimisation and economic analysis to quantify the viability and profitability of an integrated nutrient and energy recovery treatment train
    Vaneeckhaute, Celine
    Remigi, Enrico U.
    Tack, Filip M. G.
    Meers, Erik
    Belia, Evangelina
    Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (01) : 2 - 12
  • [49] An economic theory of infrastructure and commons management
    Frischmann, BM
    [J]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 2005, 89 (04) : 917 - +
  • [50] Private law arrangements for the commons A new comparative perspective
    Spano, Michele
    [J]. COMMONS, PLANT BREEDING AND AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH: CHALLENGES FOR FOOD SECURITY AND AGROBIODIVERSITY, 2018, : 109 - 116