A new DEA common-weight multi-criteria decision-making approach for technology selection

被引:20
|
作者
Chu, Junfei [1 ]
Wu, Jie [2 ]
Chu, Chengbin [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Ming [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Paris Est, ESIEE Paris, Noisy Le Grand, France
[5] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Technology selection; data envelopment analysis; common weight; multi-criteria decision-making; mixed-integer linear programming; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; CROSS-EFFICIENCY; MODEL; JUSTIFICATION; PREFERENCES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2019.1634294
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper addresses an advanced manufacturing technology selection problem by proposing a new common-weight multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach in the evaluation framework of data envelopment analysis (DEA). We improve existing technology selection models by giving a new mathematical formulation to simplify the calculation process and to ensure its use in more general situations with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. Further, an algorithm is provided to solve the proposed model based on mixed-integer linear programming and dichotomy. Compared with previous approaches for technology selection, our approach brings new contributions. First, it guarantees that only one decision-making unit (DMU) (referring to a technology) can be evaluated as efficient and selected as the best performer while maximising the minimum efficiency among all the DMUs. Second, the number of mixed-integer linear programs to solve is independent of the number of candidates. In addition, it guarantees the uniqueness of the final optimal set of common weights. Two benchmark instances are used to compare the proposed approach with existing ones. A computational experiment with randomly generated instances is further proceeded to show that the proposed approach is more suitable for situations with large datasets.
引用
收藏
页码:3686 / 3700
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Six Sigma Project Selection
    Percin, Selcuk
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (05) : 610 - 621
  • [32] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Six Sigma Project Selection
    Perçin S.
    Kahraman C.
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2010, 3 (5) : 610 - 621
  • [33] Preferential Selection of Software Quality Models Based on a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Verma, Ankita
    Agarwal, Anushka
    Rathore, Manisha
    Bisht, Sneha
    Singh, Deepti
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE INNOVATION, 2023, 11 (01) : 26 - 26
  • [34] Charging strategy selection for electric bus systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Sadrani, Mohammad
    Najafi, Amirhossein
    Mirqasemi, Razieh
    Antoniou, Constantinos
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 347
  • [35] Selection of a trigeneration system using a fuzzy AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Nieto-Morote, A.
    Ruz-Vila, F.
    Canovas-Rodriguez, F. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 35 (09) : 781 - 794
  • [36] Site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Bao, Minghan
    Arzaghi, Ehsan
    Abaei, Mohammad Mahdi
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Garaniya, Vikram
    Abdussamie, Nagi
    Heasman, Kevin
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 229
  • [37] SUPPLIER EVALUATION AND SELECTION: A FUZZY NOVEL MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION-MAKING APPROACH
    Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov
    Varela, Maria Leonilde
    Putnik, Goran
    Avila, Paulo
    Agyemang, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (02) : 459 - 486
  • [38] A New Belief Function Based Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Support
    Dezert, Jean
    Han, Deqiang
    Yin, Hanlin
    [J]. 2016 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION), 2016, : 782 - 789
  • [39] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [40] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for longitudinal data
    Chejarla, Kalyana C.
    Vaidya, Omkarprasad S.
    [J]. OPSEARCH, 2024, 61 (03) : 1013 - 1060