Clinical value of additional resection of a margin-positive distal bile duct in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

被引:31
|
作者
Otsuka, S. [1 ,2 ]
Ebata, T. [1 ]
Yokoyama, Y. [1 ]
Mizuno, T. [1 ]
Tsukahara, T. [1 ,2 ]
Shimoyama, Y. [2 ]
Ando, M. [3 ]
Nagino, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Clin Labs, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ Hosp, Dept Adv Med, Data Coordinating Ctr, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; BILIARY; HEPATOPANCREATODUODENECTOMY; SURVIVAL; CLASSIFICATION; CANCER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11125
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Little is known about the effect of additional resection for a frozen-section-positive distal bile duct margin (DM) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2001 and 2015 were analysed retrospectively, focusing on the DM. Results: Of 558 consecutive patients who underwent frozen-section examination for a DM, 74 (13.3 per cent) had a frozen-section-positive DM with invasive cancer or carcinoma in situ. Eventually, 53 patients underwent additional resection (bile duct resection in 44 and pancreatoduodenectomy in 9), whereas the remaining 21 patients did not. Ultimately, R0 resection was achieved in 30 of the 53 patients (57 per cent). No patient who underwent additional resection died from surgical complications. The 44 patients with additional bile duct resection had a 5-year overall survival rate of 31 per cent. Overall survival of the nine patients who had pancreatoduodenectomy was better, with a 10-year rate of 67 per cent. Survival of the 21 patients without additional resection was dismal: all died within 5 years. Multivariable analyses identified nodal status and additional resection as independent prognostic factors (lymph node metastasis: hazard ratio (HR) 2.26, 95 per cent c. i. 1.26 to 4.07; bile duct resection versus no additional resection: HR 0.32, 0.17 to 0.60; pancreatoduodenectomy versus no additional resection: HR 0.08, 0.02 to 0.29). Conclusion: Additional resection for frozen-section-positive DM in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma frequently yields R0 margins. It offers a better chance of long-term survival, and thus should be performed in carefully selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 782
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benign hilar bile duct strictures resected as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Otsuka, S.
    Ebata, T.
    Yokoyama, Y.
    Igami, T.
    Mizuno, T.
    Yamaguchi, J.
    Onoe, S.
    Watanabe, N.
    Shimoyama, Y.
    Nagino, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (11) : 1504 - 1510
  • [32] Characteristics of bile microbiota in cholelithiasis, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer
    Li, Zhengqi
    Chu, Jiangtao
    Su, Feixiong
    Ding, Xuan
    Zhang, Yueming
    Dou, Lizhou
    Liu, Yong
    Ke, Yan
    Liu, Xudong
    Liu, Yumeng
    Wang, Guiqi
    Wang, Linheng
    He, Shun
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (05): : 2962 - 2971
  • [33] Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    House, M. G.
    Endo, I.
    Klimstra, D. S.
    Gonen, M.
    Fong, Y.
    D'Angelica, M.
    DeMatteo, R. P.
    Blumgart, L. H.
    Jarnagin, W. R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 : 6 - 6
  • [34] Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Endo, Itaru
    House, Michael G.
    Klimstra, David S.
    Goenen, Mithat
    D'Angelica, Michael
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Fong, Yuman
    Blumgart, Leslie H.
    Jarnagin, William R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (08) : 2104 - 2112
  • [35] Clinical Significance of Intraoperative Bile Duct Margin Assessment for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Itaru Endo
    Michael G. House
    David S. Klimstra
    Mithat Gönen
    Michael D’Angelica
    Ronald P. DeMatteo
    Yuman Fong
    Leslie H. Blumgart
    William R. Jarnagin
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15
  • [36] Margin-Positive Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma during Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Additional Resection Does Not Improve Survival
    Richard Zheng
    David Nauheim
    Jonathan Bassig
    Matthew Chadwick
    Christopher W. Schultz
    Geoffrey Krampitz
    Harish Lavu
    Jordan R. Winter
    Charles J. Yeo
    Adam C. Berger
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 1552 - 1562
  • [37] The impact of resection margin positive according to lymph node metastasis status in survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Sarkhampee, P.
    Ouransatien, W.
    Lertsawatvicha, N.
    Chansitthichok, S.
    Wattanarath, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S125 - S125
  • [38] Margin-Positive Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma during Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Additional Resection Does Not Improve Survival
    Zheng, Richard
    Nauheim, David
    Bassig, Jonathan
    Chadwick, Matthew
    Schultz, Christopher W.
    Krampitz, Geoffrey
    Lavu, Harish
    Winter, Jordan R.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Berger, Adam C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 1552 - 1562
  • [39] Prognostic comparison of the longitudinal margin status in distal bile duct cancer: R0 on first bile duct resection versus R0 after additional resection
    Park, Yejong
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    Jun, Sun-Young
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Song, Ki Byung
    Jun, Eun Sung
    Kim, Song Cheol
    Park, Kwang-Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (05) : 169 - 178
  • [40] ASO Visual Abstract: Role of Intraoperative Assessment of Proximal Bile Duct Margin Status and Additional Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma—Can Local Clearance Trump Tumor Biology? A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fumihiro Kawano
    Hiromichi Ito
    Atsushi Oba
    Yoshihiro Ono
    Takafumi Sato
    Yosuke Inoue
    Yoshihiro Mise
    Akio Saiura
    Yu Takahashi
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 3362 - 3362