Methodological considerations for the design and implementation of a fully longitudinal mixed methods study

被引:6
|
作者
Schumacher, Karen L. [1 ,2 ]
Plano Clark, Vicki L. [3 ]
Eilers, June [2 ]
Kigondu, Naomi [2 ]
Geary, Carol [2 ]
Kupzyk, Kevin [2 ]
Lydiatt, William M. [4 ]
Lackner, Rudy P. [5 ]
Ly, Quan [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Nursing, N631,2 Koret Way, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Nursing, 985330 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Educ, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Nebraska Methodist Hlth Syst, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Med, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
cancer; caregivers; longitudinal; mixed methods; research design; FAMILY CAREGIVERS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; INTEGRATION; EXPERIENCE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1002/nur.22133
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Growing interest is evident in longitudinal mixed methods research, particularly fully longitudinal mixed methods designs in which both quantitative and qualitative data are collected concurrently for the duration of the study. Fully longitudinal mixed methods designs are particularly relevant for research on dynamic phenomena because of their ability to illuminate both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of change in real time as the phenomenon of interest changes. However, these are complex research designs and their data-intense nature makes them potentially burdensome for study participants, challenging for research teams, and costly for funding agencies. Despite growing use, the methodological literature on fully longitudinal mixed methods research is sparse and little guidance is available for researchers considering this approach. We address this gap by describing our experience with the design and implementation of a fully longitudinal mixed methods study of a dynamic phenomenon, namely, family caregiving during cancer treatment. We describe important questions and key decisions confronted while developing the research proposal, proactive strategies for study implementation, and implementation realities encountered while the study was in progress. On the basis of insights gained through real-world experience, we offer three guiding principles for researchers undertaking such a study. First, align the study design with the nature of the dynamics in the phenomenon of interest. Second, plan from the start when and how the integration of the longitudinal quantitative and qualitative data will occur. Third, employ implementation strategies that take into account the practical aspects of repeated contacts with study participants for an extended period.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 580
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methodological Considerations in a Community-Based Longitudinal Study
    Oman, Roy F.
    Vesely, Sara K.
    Aspy, Cheryl B.
    Fluhr, Janene
    Marshall, LaDonna
    Calhoun, George
    Rodine, Sharon
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2009, 33 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [2] The Co-Twin Control Design: Implementation and Methodological Considerations
    Gonggrijp, Bodine M. A.
    van de Weijer, Steve G. A.
    Bijleveld, Catrien C. J. H.
    van Dongen, Jenny
    Boomsma, Dorret I.
    [J]. TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 26 (4-5) : 249 - 256
  • [3] SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY RESEARCH
    MCNAMARA, JR
    MACDONOU.TS
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1972, 3 (03) : 361 - 378
  • [4] FENCLOFENAC - METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE-2 STUDIES
    GOLDBERG, AAJ
    SMITH, RB
    TUDOR, R
    CLARKE, DR
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1975, 4 : 71 - 71
  • [5] Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
    Bunger, Alicia C.
    Chuang, Emmeline
    Girth, Amanda
    Lancaster, Kathryn E.
    Gadel, Fawn
    Himmeger, Marla
    Saldana, Lisa
    Powell, Byron J.
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [6] Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
    Alicia C. Bunger
    Emmeline Chuang
    Amanda Girth
    Kathryn E. Lancaster
    Fawn Gadel
    Marla Himmeger
    Lisa Saldana
    Byron J. Powell
    Gregory A. Aarons
    [J]. Implementation Science, 15
  • [7] RETROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH - METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    FEATHERMAN, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 1980, 32 (02) : 152 - 169
  • [8] Stunting: methodological considerations for improved study design and reporting
    Rohloff, Peter
    Flom, Peter
    [J]. BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [9] Revisiting longitudinal qualitative studies in social work: considerations for design and methodological insights
    de-Toro, Ximena
    Rubilar, Gabriela
    Saracostti, Mahia
    [J]. LONGITUDINAL AND LIFE COURSE STUDIES, 2024, 15 (03): : 407 - 430
  • [10] Longitudinal mixed-methods analysis of tertiary students' dropout considerations
    Lykkegaard, Eva
    Qvortrup, Ane
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9