The Co-Twin Control Design: Implementation and Methodological Considerations

被引:6
|
作者
Gonggrijp, Bodine M. A. [1 ,2 ]
van de Weijer, Steve G. A. [1 ]
Bijleveld, Catrien C. J. H. [1 ,3 ]
van Dongen, Jenny [2 ,4 ]
Boomsma, Dorret I. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NSC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Criminal Law & Criminol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Discordant twin design; causal inference; genetic confounding; twin research; LIFE EVENTS; TWIN; BIRTH; DEPRESSION; CAUSATION; DIRECTION; WEIGHT; SAMPLE; COHORT;
D O I
10.1017/thg.2023.35
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Establishing causal relationships in observational studies is an important step in research and policy decision making. The association between an exposure and an outcome can be confounded by multiple factors, often making it hard to draw causal conclusions. The co-twin control design (CTCD) is a powerful approach that allows for the investigation of causal effects while controlling for genetic and shared environmental confounding factors. This article introduces the CTCD and offers an overview of analysis methods for binary and continuous outcome and exposure variables. Tools for data simulation are provided, along with practical guidance and accompanying scripts for implementing the CTCD in R, SPSS, and Stata. While the CTCD offers valuable insights into causal inference, it depends on several assumptions that are important when interpreting CTCD results. By presenting a broad overview of the CTCD, this article aims to equip researchers with actionable recommendations and a comprehensive understanding of the design's strengths and limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Matched survival data in a co-twin control design
    Mette Gerster
    Mia Madsen
    Per Kragh Andersen
    [J]. Lifetime Data Analysis, 2014, 20 : 38 - 50
  • [2] Matched survival data in a co-twin control design
    Gerster, Mette
    Madsen, Mia
    Andersen, Per Kragh
    [J]. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2014, 20 (01) : 38 - 50
  • [3] Statistical power to detect causality in the co-twin control design
    de Moor, Marleen
    de Geus, Eco
    Boomsma, Dorret
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2011, 41 (06) : 900 - 900
  • [4] Co-twin control designs for testing behavioral economic theories of child nutrition: methodological note
    Faith, M. S.
    Rose, E.
    Matz, P. E.
    Pietrobelli, A.
    Epstein, L. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2006, 30 (10) : 1501 - 1505
  • [5] Co-twin control designs for testing behavioral economic theories of child nutrition: methodological note
    M S Faith
    E Rose
    P E Matz
    A Pietrobelli
    L H Epstein
    [J]. International Journal of Obesity, 2006, 30 : 1501 - 1505
  • [6] Smoking and personality: A co-twin control study
    Pergadia, ML
    Heath, AC
    Lynskey, MT
    Lessov, CN
    Martin, NG
    Madden, PAF
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2002, 32 (06) : 480 - 480
  • [7] Irritable Bowel syndrome: A co-twin control analysis
    Wojczynski, Mary K.
    North, Kari E.
    Pedersen, Nancy L.
    Sullivan, Patrick F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (10): : 2220 - 2229
  • [8] Risk factors of migraine - a co-twin control study
    Le, H.
    Tfelt-Hansen, P.
    Skytthe, A.
    Kyvik, K.
    Olesen, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 53 - 53
  • [9] Subjective Wellbeing and Longevity: A Co-Twin Control Study
    Sadler, Michael E.
    Miller, Christopher J.
    Christensen, Kaare
    McGue, Matt
    [J]. TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 14 (03) : 249 - 256
  • [10] Risk factors of migraine - a co-twin control study
    Hambardzumyan, H. D.
    Manvelyan, H. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2014, 15