The Take Control of Your Blood pressure (TCYB) study: Study design and methodology

被引:43
|
作者
Bosworth, Hayden B.
Olsen, Maren K.
Dudley, Tara
Orr, Melinda
Neary, Alice
Harrelson, Mikeal
Adams, Martha
Svetkey, Laura P.
Dolor, Rowena J.
Oddone, Eugene Z.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Res Primary Care, VAMC, Durham, NC 27703 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Ctr Aging & Human Dev, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
hypertension; blood pressure control; clinical trial; self-management; adherence;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Among the 65 million Americans with hypertension, only approximately 31% have their blood pressure under control (< 140/90 mm/Hg). Despite the damaging impact of hypertension and the availability of evidence-based target values for blood pressure, interventions to improve blood pressure control have had limited success. Objectives: A randomized controlled health services intervention trial with a two by two design is being conducted to improve blood pressure control. This five-year trial evaluates two patient-directed interventions designed to improve blood pressure control among patients diagnosed with hypertension in a community-based primary care setting. Methods: Patients are randomized to one of four groups: usual care, home blood pressure monitoring, tailored behavioral self-management intervention that is administered via telephone by a nurse, or a combination of the home blood pressure monitoring and tailored behavioral intervention. Patients receiving the home blood pressure monitoring are trained in the use of an electronic blood pressure measurement device, are asked to measure their blood pressure 3 times/week, and send in two-month blood pressure recordings throughout the 24-month study duration. The behavioral intervention incorporates patients' need assessments and involves tailored behavioral and education modules to promote medication adherence and improve specific health behaviors. A nurse delivers all behavioral self-management modules over the telephone bi-monthly for 24 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who achieve control of their blood pressure based on evidence-based guidelines (for patients without diabetes < 140/90 mm/Hg, for patients with diabetes < 130/80 mm/Hg) evaluated at six-month intervals over 24 months (five measurements) using a random-zero sphygmomanometer. Conclusion: Despite the known risk of poor blood pressure control, and the wide availability of effective treatment strategies, a majority of adults still do not have their blood pressure controlled. This study will be an important step in defining two explicit interventions to improve blood pressure control. To our knowledge, this study is the first to combine both a tailored behavioral self-management intervention and self-monitoring home blood pressure intervention to improve blood pressure control among patients in a primary care setting. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality control of the blood pressure phenotype in the Gaoyou population study
    Lu, Yi-Chao
    Li, Shan-Shan
    Zhang, Hai-Feng
    Odili, Augustine N.
    Yao, Wen-Ming
    Gong, Lei
    Zhou, Yan-Li
    Zhou, Fang
    Yang, Rong
    Sheng, Yan-Hui
    Xu, Dong-Jie
    Kong, Xiang-Qing
    Staessen, Jan A.
    Li, Xin-Li
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE, 2016, 25 (03) : 162 - 168
  • [42] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH "IN-STUDY" BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL: FINDINGS FROM THE 2ND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD PRESSURE STUDY
    Chowdhury, E. K.
    Owen, A.
    Krum, H.
    Wing, L. M. H.
    Ryan, P.
    Reid, C. M.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2011, 58 (01) : 129 - 129
  • [43] Concept, study design, and baseline blood pressure control status of the nationwide prospective HI-JAMP study using multisensor ABPM
    Kario, Kazuomi
    Tomitani, Naoko
    Nishizawa, Masafumi
    Harada, Noriko
    Kanegae, Hiroshi
    Hoshide, Satoshi
    [J]. HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2023, 46 (02) : 357 - 367
  • [44] Randomized study of traditional versus aggressive systolic blood pressure control (Cardio-Sis): rationale, design and characteristics of the study population
    Verdecchia, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2008, 22 (04) : 243 - 251
  • [46] Home blood pressure measurements associated with better blood pressure control: the J-HOME study
    T Obara
    T Ohkubo
    K Asayama
    H Metoki
    R Inoue
    M Kikuya
    T Kato
    K Tanaka
    A Hara
    J Hashimoto
    K Totsune
    Y Imai
    [J]. Journal of Human Hypertension, 2008, 22 : 197 - 204
  • [47] Home blood pressure measurements associated with better blood pressure control: the J-HOME study
    Obara, T.
    Ohkubo, T.
    Asayama, K.
    Metoki, H.
    Inoue, R.
    Kikuya, M.
    Kato, T.
    Tanaka, K.
    Hara, A.
    Hashimoto, J.
    Totsune, K.
    Imai, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2008, 22 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [48] Impact of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control in older individuals: a French randomized study
    Tzourio, Christophe
    Hanon, Olivier
    Godin, Ophelia
    Soumare, Aicha
    Dufouil, Carole
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (03) : 612 - 620
  • [49] How Not To Design and Analyse Your Study
    Earnest, A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2012, 21 (04) : 309 - 311
  • [50] How to choose your study design
    Mellis, Craig M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2020, 56 (07) : 1018 - 1022