Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale

被引:27
|
作者
Hadders-Algra, Mijna [1 ]
Tacke, Uta [2 ]
Pietz, Joachim [3 ]
Rupp, Andre [4 ]
Philippi, Heike [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Paediat, Div Dev Neurol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Childrens Hosp UKBB, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Palliat Care Team Children & Adolescents, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Neurol, Sect Biomagnetism, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Ctr Child Neurol, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
关键词
CEREBRAL-PALSY; BASIC CONDITIONS; PRETERM INFANTS; INTERVENTION; VARIABILITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/dmcn.14045
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim To assess reliability and predictive validity of the neurological scale of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA), a recently developed assessment for infants aged 6 weeks to 12 months. Method To assess reliability, three assessors independently rated video-recorded neurological assessments of 24 infants twice. Item difficulty and discrimination were determined. To evaluate predictive validity, 181 infants (median gestational age 30wks [range 22-41wks]; 92 males, 89 females) attending a non-academic outpatient clinic were assessed with SINDA's neurological scale (28 dichotomized items). Atypical neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months or older corrected age implied a Bayley Mental Developmental Index or Psychomotor Developmental Index lower than 70 or a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP). Predictive values were calculated from SINDA (2-12mo corrected age, median 3mo) and typical versus atypical outcome. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients of intrarater and interrater agreement of the neurological score varied between 0.923 and 0.965. Item difficulty and discrimination were satisfactory. At 24 months or older, 56 children (31%) had an atypical outcome (29 had CP). Atypical neurological scores (below 25th centile, <= 21) predicted atypical outcome and CP with sensitivities of 89% and 100%, and specificities of 94% and 81% respectively. Interpretation SINDA's neurological scale is reliable and in a non-academic outpatient setting has a satisfactory predictive validity for atypical developmental outcome, including CP, at 24 months or older.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and predictive validity of the Food Technology Neophobia Scale
    Evans, G.
    Kermarrec, C.
    Sable, T.
    Cox, D. N.
    APPETITE, 2010, 54 (02) : 390 - 393
  • [22] Predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA) to identify 4-5 year-old children at risk of developmental delay in a low-risk sample
    Rosinda, Selena J.
    Hoekstra, Pieter J.
    Hadders-Algra, Mijna
    de Bildt, Annelies
    Heineman, Kirsten R.
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 196
  • [23] THE CANADIAN NEUROLOGICAL SCALE - VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
    COTE, R
    BATTISTA, RN
    WOLFSON, C
    BOUCHER, J
    ADAM, J
    HACHINSKI, V
    NEUROLOGY, 1989, 39 (05) : 638 - 643
  • [24] THE CANADIAN NEUROLOGICAL SCALE - VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
    BATTISTA, RN
    COTE, R
    WOLFSON, C
    BOUCHER, J
    ADAM, J
    HACHINSKI, V
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : A308 - A308
  • [25] Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Infant Acute Pain Assessment Scale (NIAPAS) in Turkish: prospective study
    Kanbur, Bahar Nur
    Mutlu, Birsen
    Salihoglu, Ozgul
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 139 (04): : 305 - 311
  • [26] The Elkins Hypnotizability Scale: Assessment of Reliability and Validity
    Kekecs, Zoltan
    Bowers, Juliette
    Johnson, Alisa
    Kendrick, Cassie
    Elkins, Gary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS, 2016, 64 (03) : 285 - 304
  • [27] Validity and reliability of the Italian Constipation Assessment Scale
    Dal Molin, A.
    McMillan, S. C.
    Zenerino, F.
    Rattone, V.
    Grubich, S.
    Guazzini, A.
    Rasero, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2012, 18 (07) : 321 - 325
  • [28] The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale: Reliability and validity
    Eisen, JL
    Phillips, KA
    Baer, L
    Beer, DA
    Atala, KD
    Rasmussen, SA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 155 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [29] Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment Rating Scale
    Schwartz, RC
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1999, 84 (02) : 389 - 391
  • [30] Stewardship Climate Scale: An Assessment of Reliability and Validity
    Neubaum, Donald O.
    Thomas, Christopher H.
    Dibrell, Clay
    Craig, Justin B.
    FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 30 (01) : 37 - 60