The reliability and validity of the Care Planning Assessment Tool

被引:4
|
作者
Fleming, Richard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Hlth & Behav Sci, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Dementia Serv Dev Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
aged care; assessment; care planning;
D O I
10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00321.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: The development of a simple, comprehensive, valid and reliable tool to assist aged care services staff develops and monitors care plans. Method: An assessment with proven utility in a psychogeriatric setting was modified to improve its relevance to aged care services. Reliability was assessed from the scores obtained from two independent raters assessing 48 randomly selected residents in a large aged care facility. Validity was assessed by comparison with well-validated measures of cognition and function. Results: The Care Planning Assessment Tool has very high interrater reliability and good internal consistency. The validity of the subscales compared with well-validated assessments was very high. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Care Planning Assessment Tool are sufficiently good to allow it to be used with confidence in the care planning process. This is supported by a similar evaluation carried out on the Japanese version.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 211
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Prospective Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Live Donor Assessment Tool
    Iacoviello, Brian M.
    Shenoy, Akhil
    Hunt, Julia
    Filipovic-Jewell, Zorica
    Haydel, Brandy
    Rudow, Dianne LaPointe
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2017, 58 (05) : 519 - 526
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool
    Tomita, Aya
    Tahara-Sasagawa, Emi
    Yonezawa, Kaori
    Usui, Yuriko
    Haruna, Megumi
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2023, 121
  • [33] The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children
    Huang, Anyan
    Wu, Kusheng
    Li, Anna
    Zhang, Xuanzhi
    Lin, Yuhang
    Huang, Yanhong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (10)
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool in the Turkish population
    Dolgun, Gulumser
    Inal, Sevil
    Erdim, Leyla
    Korkut, Sevda
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2018, 57 : 47 - 53
  • [35] Establishing the Validity and Reliability Evidence of Preceptor Assessment of Student Tool
    Zhou, Lili
    Almutairi, Abdulaali R.
    Alsaid, Nimer S.
    Warholak, Terri L.
    Cooley, Janet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 81 (08) : 10 - 20
  • [36] CANCER SYMPTOMS ASSESSMENT: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A NEWLY DEVELOPED TOOL
    McMillan, Susan
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2014, 41 (02) : E85 - E86
  • [37] Hypertonia Assessment Tool: Reliability and Validity in Children With Neuromotor Disorders
    Marsico, Petra
    Frontzek-Weps, Victoria
    Balzer, Julia
    van Hedel, Hubertus J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2017, 32 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [38] Validity and Reliability of the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool, the Mother Baby Assessment Tool, and the LATCH Scoring System
    Altuntas, Nilgun
    Turkyilmaz, Canan
    Yildiz, Havva
    Kulali, Ferit
    Hirfanoglu, Ibrahim
    Onal, Esra
    Ergenekon, Ebru
    Koc, Esin
    Atalay, Yildiz
    [J]. BREASTFEEDING MEDICINE, 2014, 9 (04) : 191 - 195
  • [39] Dementia Care Mapping reconsidered: exploring the reliability and validity of the observational tool
    Thornton, A
    Hatton, C
    Tatham, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 19 (08) : 718 - 726
  • [40] Capitation care fee banding: aspects of reliability and validity of an online tool
    M. Busby
    L. Chapple
    H. Clover
    J. McCreanor
    I. Chapple
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2018, 225 : 751 - 755