Results from pooled Phase III studies of ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception

被引:40
|
作者
Moreau, Caroline [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Trussell, James [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, U1018, CESP Ctr Res Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, F-94807 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[2] Univ Paris 11, UMRS 1018, F-94807 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Inst Natl Etud Demog, F-75020 Paris, France
[4] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[5] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
Emergency contraception; Efficacy; Obesity; Selective progesterone receptor modulator; LEVONORGESTREL; ENDOMETRIUM; GLYCODELIN; EXPRESSION; PREGNANCY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a new effective option to prevent unintended pregnancies up to 5 days after unprotected intercourse. We used pooled data from two Phase III studies to refine our understanding of the efficacy of UPA by time from unprotected intercourse and the effects of other factors on pregnancy rates. Study Design: Data from two Phase III studies were pooled to create a larger analysis population. Analyses were performed on the first participation of 2183 women. Results: A total of 41 women became pregnant despite the use of UPA, yielding an overall proportion pregnant of 1.9% (1.3%-2.5%). Proportions of pregnant women were higher among those with further acts of unprotected intercourse in the same cycle and among obese women. These varied from 1.3% (0.9%-2.0%) among nonobese women who had no further acts of unprotected intercourse (n=1704) to 8.3% (0.2%-38.5%) among obese women who had subsequent unprotected intercourse (n=12). Conclusions: UPA is effective and safe in preventing pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. Its effectiveness is lower among women who have subsequent unprotected intercourse and among obese women. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 680
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate emergency contraception in women with normal and obese body mass index
    Praditpan, Piyapa
    Hamouie, Angie
    Basaraba, Cale N.
    Nandakumar, Renu
    Cremers, Serge
    Davis, Anne R.
    Westhoff, Carolyn L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 95 (05) : 464 - 469
  • [32] ULIPRISTAL ACETATE (UPA) IS AFFORDABLE AS EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION (EC) IF USED WHERE LEVONORGESTREL (LNG) IS UNLICENSED
    Jones, A. B.
    Garcia, L. Dominguez
    Cohen, C. E.
    Nwokolo, N.
    Day, S. L.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2012, 88 : A39 - A39
  • [33] ULIPRISTAL ACETATE VERSUS LOW-DOSE MIFEPRISTONE FOR EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Abstracts
    Anyikam, A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 85 (03) : 317 - 318
  • [34] Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies
    Sperling, Michael R.
    French, Jacqueline
    Jacobson, Mercedes P.
    Pazdera, Ladislav
    Gough, Mallory
    Cheng, Hailong
    Grinnell, Todd
    Blum, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86 (12) : 1095 - 1102
  • [35] Menstruation behavior after use of emergency contraception: Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel in women of reproductive age
    Stanoulov, G.
    Bourazan, Chalil A.
    Tsikouras, P.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (10) : E233 - E234
  • [36] Ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception: postmarketing experience after use by more than 1 million women
    Levy, Delphine P.
    Jager, Martine
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Abitbol, Jean-Louis
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (05) : 431 - 433
  • [37] Prevention of unintended pregnancies by using emergency contraception: the differences between levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate. A theoretical model using data from a survey on the use of emergency contraception in Spain, 2017
    Lete, Inaki
    Luis Doval, Jose
    Perez-Campos, Ezequiel
    Jesus Alonso, Maria
    Sellers, Guillermo
    Sanchez-Borrego, Rafael
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (07) : 582 - 585
  • [38] Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate - a prospective observational cohort study
    Envall, Niklas
    Kofoed, Nina Groes
    Kopp-Kallner, Helena
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (08) : 887 - 893
  • [39] Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis
    Glasier, Anna F.
    Cameron, Sharon T.
    Fine, Paul M.
    Logan, Susan J. S.
    Casale, William
    Van Horn, Jennifer
    Sogor, Laszlo
    Blithe, Diana L.
    Scherrer, Bruno
    Mathe, Henri
    Jaspart, Amelie
    Ulmann, Andre
    Gainer, Erin
    LANCET, 2010, 375 (9714): : 555 - 562
  • [40] Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel
    Glasier, Anna
    Cameron, Sharon T.
    Blithe, Diana
    Scherrer, Bruno
    Mathe, Henri
    Levy, Delphine
    Gainer, Erin
    Ulmann, Andre
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (04) : 363 - 367