Spatial layout and face-to-face interaction in offices- a study of the mechanisms of spatial effects on face-to-face interaction

被引:78
|
作者
Rashid, Mahbub
Kampschroer, Kevin
Wineman, Jean
Zimring, Craig
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Design, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] US Gen Serv Adm, Publ Bldg Serv, Washington, DC 20405 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Taubman Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Architecture, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1068/b31123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper we report a study that uses space-syntax theories and techniques to develop a model explaining how spatial layouts, through their effects on movement and visible copresence, may affect face-to-face interaction in offices. Though several previous space-syntax studies have shown that spatial layouts have significant effects on movement and face-to-face interaction in offices, none has investigated the relations among movement, visible copresence, and face-to-face interaction in offices with significantly different layouts. On the basis of statistical analyses of the spatial and behavioral data collected at four moderately large offices, this study shows that spatial layouts have consistent effects on movement, but inconsistent effects on visible copresence and face-to-face interaction; that visible copresence, not movement, is an important predictor of face-to-face interaction; that movement has negligible effects on the relationship between visible copresence and face-to-face interaction; and that functional programs have little or no effect on the culture of face-to-face interaction in these offices. Limitations of the research design for workplace study and implications of the research findings for workplace design and management are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 844
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Epidemic spreading on mixing group with face-to-face interaction
    Gu, Wenbin
    Li, Wenjie
    Gao, Feng
    Su, Sheng
    Zhang, Zengping
    Liu, Xiaoyang
    Wang, Wei
    CHAOS, 2024, 34 (09)
  • [32] A face-to-face
    Ndiaye, Marie
    NOUVELLE REVUE FRANCAISE, 2009, (588): : 359 - 361
  • [33] Facebook and MySpace: Complement or Substitute for Face-to-Face Interaction?
    Kujath, Carlyne L.
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2011, 14 (1-2) : 75 - 78
  • [34] Eye movements and gestures in human face-to-face interaction
    Gullberg, M
    MIND'S EYE: COGNITIVE AND APPLIED ASPECTS OF EYE MOVEMENT RESEARCH, 2003, : 685 - 703
  • [35] Applying sociolinguistics: Domains and face-to-face interaction.
    Vann, R
    MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2004, 88 (01): : 140 - 141
  • [36] FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION IN PEER-NOMINATION PROCESS
    LEWIN, AY
    DUBNO, P
    AKULA, WG
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 55 (05) : 495 - &
  • [37] THE DEVELOPMENT OF FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION OF INFANT AND CAREGIVER - THE ORIENTATION
    BRUSER, E
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENTWICKLUNGSPSYCHOLOGIE UND PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1986, 18 (02): : 114 - 121
  • [38] Modeling Human Dynamics of Face-to-Face Interaction Networks
    Starnini, Michele
    Baronchelli, Andrea
    Pastor-Satorras, Romualdo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2013, 110 (16)
  • [39] Automatic Motherese Detection for Face-to-Face Interaction Analysis
    Mahdhaoui, A.
    Chetouani, M.
    Zong, C.
    Cassel, R. S.
    Saint-Georges, C.
    Laznik, M-C.
    Maestro, S.
    Apicella, F.
    Muratori, F.
    Cohen, D.
    MULTIMODAL SIGNAL: COGNITIVE AND ALGORITHMIC ISSUES, 2009, 5398 : 248 - +
  • [40] Emotional contagion for pain during face-to-face interaction
    Murata, Aiko
    Nishida, Hiroshi
    Ohie, Kei
    Kameda, Tatsuya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 70 - 71