Interexaminer Reliability of Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessments

被引:9
|
作者
Simard, Marie-Noelle [1 ,5 ]
Lambert, Jean [2 ]
Lachance, Christian [3 ,5 ]
Audibert, Francois [4 ,5 ]
Gosselin, Julie [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Sch Rehabil, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[5] CHU St Justine, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
GENERAL MOVEMENTS; PRETERM BIRTH; FOLLOW-UP; TERM; INFANTS; CHILDREN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.05.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Both the Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessment at Term and the Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessment From Birth to 6 Years Old are based on the same conceptual framework and both can be used throughout childhood; however, interobserver reliability must be evaluated before these assessments can be introduced into neurodevelopmental follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of both assessments. Infants between 29 and 37 weeks gestation were examined with the Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessment at Term (n = 33) and with the Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessment From Birth to 6 Years Old (n = 26). The infants were assessed by two examiners, one after and in the absence of the other. The kappa coefficient and percentage of agreement were calculated. The majority of items in both assessments showed an excellent reliability. The kappa coefficient for the final synthesis was also excellent in both cases. Future studies on the predictive validity of both assessments are required to determine their utility in predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. (C) 2009 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interexaminer reliability of the German version of the DC/TMD
    Asendorf, Anne
    Mollenkamp, Johanna
    Schierz, Oliver
    Rauch, Angelika
    Asendorf, Thomas
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Eberhard, Lydia
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 48 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [22] Interexaminer Reliability of Meibography: Upper or Lower Eyelid?
    Dogan, Aysun Sanal
    Kosker, Mustafa
    Arslan, Nese
    Gurdal, Canan
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 (02): : 113 - 117
  • [23] Interexaminer reliability of lumbar segmental mobility tests
    Johansson, Fredrik
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (04) : 331 - 336
  • [24] An assessment of the interexaminer reliability of tests for shoulder instability
    Tzannes, A
    Paxinos, A
    Callanan, M
    Murrell, GAC
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2004, 13 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [25] Interexaminer reliability of the deltoid and psoas muscle test
    Pollard, H
    Lakay, B
    Tucker, F
    Watson, B
    Bablis, P
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 28 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [26] Reliability of indicators of nursing care quality: testing interexaminer agreement and reliability
    Vituri, Dagmar Willamowius
    Martinez Evora, Yolanda Dora
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2014, 22 (02): : 234 - 240
  • [27] Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine
    Fjellner, A
    Bexander, C
    Faleij, R
    Strender, LE
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 22 (08) : 511 - 516
  • [28] How to evaluate intraexaminer reliability using an interexaminer reliability study design
    Nilsson, N
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 19 (02) : 149 - 150