Performance of Holstein heifers in feedlot receiving monensin at different levels

被引:3
|
作者
Morais de Oliveira, Marcus Vinicius [1 ]
Lana, Rogerio de Paula [2 ]
Eifert, Eduardo da Costa [3 ]
Luz, Dirce Ferreira [1 ]
de Vargas Junior, Fernando Miranda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Univ Aquidauana, Dourados, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Zootecnia, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[3] Embrapa Arroz & Feijao, Santo Antonio De Goias, Go, Brazil
关键词
bovines; dairy cattle; ionophore; ruminant; STEERS; GROWTH; FERMENTATION; METHANE;
D O I
10.1590/S1516-35982009000900028
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the ionophore monensin on the intake, weight gain, feed: gain ratio and withers and croup heights of heifers maintained in feedlot, and also the feeding costs. Twenty eight Holstein heifers were confined individually for 84 days, and fed diets containing 32.84% concentrate (corn grain, soybean meal, urea and mineral mix) and 67.16% corn silage and sugar cane, at the proportion of 1:1 in DM. The ionophore levels added to the concentrate were 0, 14, 28 and 42 mg monensin/kg DM of the offered diet, totaling four experimental diets. The experiment was analyzed as a randomized complete block design with four diets and seven replications. The monensin addition raised the cost of the diets, but the different monensin levels did not influence the dry matter intake, the crude protein and neutral detergent fiber intakes; the average daily gain; the feed: gain ratio; and the withers and croup heights.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1840
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of hard vs. soft wheat and monensin level on rumen acidosis in feedlot heifers
    Yang, W. Z.
    Xu, L.
    Zhao, Y. L.
    Chen, L. Y.
    McAllister, T. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (11) : 5088 - 5098
  • [42] Comparison of heat tolerance of feedlot heifers of different breeds
    Brown-Brandl, T. M.
    Nienaber, J. A.
    Eigenberg, R. A.
    Mader, T. L.
    Morrow, J. L.
    Dailey, J. W.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2006, 105 (1-3) : 19 - 26
  • [43] FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE OF PROGENY OF HEREFORD, HEREFORD X HOLSTEIN AND HOLSTEIN COWS
    DEAN, RA
    HOLLOWAY, JW
    WHITEMAN, JV
    STEPHENS, DF
    TOTUSEK, R
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1976, 42 (05) : 1290 - 1296
  • [44] Effects of different dietary levels of monensin on nutrient digestibility and on ruminal, blood and urinary metabolites in dairy heifers
    de Oliveira, MVM
    Lana, RD
    Freitas, AWD
    Eifert, ED
    Pereira, JC
    Valadares, SD
    Pérez, JRO
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 34 (06): : 2143 - 2154
  • [45] A COMPARISON OF MONENSIN, NARASIN, SALINOMYCIN AND TYLOSIN ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE OF STEERS
    STRASIA, CA
    OWENS, FN
    HICKS, RB
    MARTIN, JJ
    GILL, DR
    OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION, 1987, (119): : 328 - 331
  • [46] EFFECT OF MELENGEAROL ACETATE AND OXYTETRACYCLINE ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE OF HEIFERS
    UTLEY
    FEEDSTUFFS, 1971, 43 (39): : 26 - &
  • [47] Ingestive behavior of Nellore heifers grazing receiving the supplement based on propolis or monensin
    Valerio Geron, Luiz Juliano
    Zeoula, Lucia Maria
    Yoshimura, Emerson Henri
    Franco, Selma Lucy
    Neto, Marcos Chiquitelli
    Paula, Eduardo Marostegan
    Samensari, Rafael Barreiros
    Peres, Lucimar Pontara
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2014, 35 (04): : 2047 - 2061
  • [48] Factors affecting reproductive performance of Holstein heifers
    Chebel, Ricardo C.
    Braga, Fernando A.
    Dalton, Joseph C.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2007, 101 (3-4) : 208 - 224
  • [49] EFFECT OF AVOPARCIN AND MONENSIN ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE OF BEEF-CATTLE
    JOHNSON, RJ
    HERLUGSON, ML
    OJIKUTU, LB
    CORDOVA, G
    DYER, IA
    ZIMMER, P
    DELAY, R
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1979, 48 (06) : 1338 - 1342
  • [50] Feedlot performance and carcass traits of Nellore cattle fed different combinations of sodium monensin and virginiamycin.
    Rigueiro, A. L.
    Luiz, F. P.
    Squizatti, M. M.
    Assumpcao, A. H.
    Ferreira, M. M.
    Garcia, C. P.
    Muller, L. R.
    Bueno, A. P. D.
    Martins, C. L.
    Arrigoni, M. D.
    Millen, D. D.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 678 - 678