共 1 条
Research Note: Comparison of chicken blood chemistry and electrolyte parameters between the portable i-STAT1 clinical analyzer and VetScan VS2 serum biochemistry panel using Hy-Line commercial white-egg laying hens
被引:4
|作者:
Sauer, Z. C.
[1
]
Taylor, K.
[2
]
Wolc, A.
[2
,3
]
Viall, A.
[1
]
Fulton, J. E.
[2
]
Settar, P.
[2
]
Rubinoff, I
[2
]
Schaal, T.
[2
]
Sato, Y.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Vet Diagnost & Prod Anim Med, Coll Vet Med, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, IA 50063 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词:
blood gas;
blood chemistry;
laying hen;
white egg layer;
i-STAT1;
GAS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.059
中图分类号:
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号:
0905 ;
摘要:
The i-STAT1 clinical analyzer has become an increasingly popular tool in clinical production animal medicine as it can provide pen-side results in a cost effective and timely manner when compared to standard benchtop serum biochemistry blood gas and chemistry analyses. This study compares the results of the portable Abbott i-STAT1 analyzer and the Abaxis VetScan VS2 for glucose (Glu, mg/dL), ionized Ca (mmol/L), Na (mmol/L), and K(mmol/L) values. Three genetically distinct commercial varieties (CV) of Hy-Line white-egg laying hens are used in this study (Hy-Line W-36, Hy-Line W-80, and Hy-Line W-80+). Thirty blood samples (n = 10 per CV) were obtained in the production house from the brachial vein and concurrently analyzed by the i-STAT1 portable device. Serum from 22 of these same samples was analyzed via VetScan VS2, a benchtop serum clinical biochemistry analyzer, using VetScan Avian/Reptilian Profile Plus reagent rotors. A paired T-test was used to test for statistical differences in means between the 2 instruments for each of the parameters. Parameters with significant mean differences were then subject to correlation and regression analysis to further evaluate relationships between the results from the 2 methods. Significant differences between means were found for Glu, Na, and K levels. Ca levels were found to be not directly comparable by the 2 analysis instruments. This comparison elucidates the importance of clinical analyzer validations when applying different strategies of diagnostic medicine in poultry.
引用
收藏
页码:3487 / 3490
页数:4
相关论文