Regional disparities in the CO2 fertilization effect and implications for crop yields

被引:114
|
作者
McGrath, Justin M. [1 ]
Lobell, David B. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Food Secur & Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2013年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
regional variability; food security; carbon dioxide; water status; ATMOSPHERIC CARBON-DIOXIDE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; FOOD SECURITY; ELEVATED CO2; ENRICHMENT FACE; RISING CO2; GROWTH; RESPONSES; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014054
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although crop yield generally responds positively to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]), the response depends on the species and environmental conditions. Thus, even though global [CO2] is increasing roughly uniformly, regional yield response to increased [CO2] will vary due to differences in climate and the mixture of crops. Although [CO2] effects have been shown to be important for economic and food security impacts of climate change, regional [CO2] effects are not often considered, and the few studies that have considered them disagree on regional patterns. Here regional yield effects of elevated [CO2] are examined by combining experimentally determined CO2 fertilization effect estimates with grid-level data on climate, crop areas, and yields. Production stimulation varies between regions, mostly driven by differences in climate but also by the mixture of crops. The variability in yield due to the variable response to elevated [CO2] is about 50-70% of the variability in yield due to the variable response to climate. There is, however, little agreement between studies regarding which regions benefit most from elevated [CO2]. This is likely because of interactions of CO2 with temperature, species, water status, and nitrogen availability, but no models currently account for all these interactions. These results suggest that regional differences in CO2 effects are of similar importance as regional differences in climate effects and should be included in models.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Constraints on estimating the CO2 fertilization effect emerge
    Chris Huntingford
    Rebecca J. Oliver
    Nature, 2021, 600 : 224 - 225
  • [22] EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION AND CROP ROTATION ON YIELDS AND SUGAR CONTENT OF SUGAR BEET
    Hlisnikovsky, Lukas
    Kunzova, Eva
    Klir, Jan
    Hejcman, Michal
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2014, 130 (02): : 50 - 56
  • [23] Atmospheric CO2 fertilization effects on biomass yields of 10 crops in northern Germany
    Degener, Jan F.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 3
  • [24] Quantitative synthesis of temperature, CO2, rainfall, and adaptation effects on global crop yields
    Makowski, David
    Marajo-Petitzon, Elodie
    Durand, Jean-Louis
    Ben-Ari, Tamara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2020, 115
  • [26] Maize growth:: assessing the effects of global warming and CO2 fertilization with crop models
    Dhakhwa, GB
    Campbell, CL
    LeDuc, SK
    Cooter, EJ
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1997, 87 (04) : 253 - 272
  • [27] Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect
    Terrer, Cesar
    Vicca, Sara
    Hungate, Bruce A.
    Phillips, Richard P.
    Prentice, I. Colin
    SCIENCE, 2016, 353 (6294) : 72 - 74
  • [28] Effect of the crop succession and the organic and mineral fertilization on the yields of the tobacco cultivated in the sun
    Avila Medina, Ubail
    Gardon Carballido, Daniel
    Exposito Elizagaray, Irene
    CENTRO AGRICOLA, 2012, 39 (01): : 49 - 52
  • [29] THE EFFECT OF NITROGENOUS FERTILIZATION ON THE YIELDS OF REFINED SUGAR IN SUGAR-BEET CROP
    CHOCHOLA, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1987, 33 (08): : 865 - 874
  • [30] The fertilization effect of global dimming on crop yields is not attributed to an improved light interception
    Shao, Liping
    Li, Gang
    Zhao, Qiannan
    Li, Yabing
    Sun, Yutong
    Wang, Weinan
    Cai, Chuang
    Chen, Weiping
    Liu, Ronghua
    Luo, Weihong
    Yin, Xinyou
    Lee, Xuhui
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (03) : 1697 - 1713