Codeflaws: A Programming Competition Benchmark for Evaluating Automated Program Repair Tools

被引:92
|
作者
Tan, Shin Hwei [1 ]
Yi, Jooyong [2 ]
Yulis [1 ]
Mechtaev, Sergey [1 ]
Roychoudhury, Abhik [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Innopolis Univ, Innopolis, Russia
关键词
automated program repair; defect classes; empirical evaluation; benchmark;
D O I
10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.76
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Several automated program repair techniques have been proposed to reduce the time and effort spent in bug-fixing. While these repair tools are designed to be generic such that they could address many software faults, different repair tools may fix certain types of faults more effectively than other tools. Therefore, it is important to compare more objectively the effectiveness of different repair tools on various fault types. However, existing benchmarks on automated program repairs do not allow thorough investigation of the relationship between fault types and the effectiveness of repair tools. We present Codeflaws, a set of 3902 defects from 7436 programs automatically classified across 39 defect classes (we refer to different types of fault as defect classes derived from the syntactic differences between a buggy program and a patched program).
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 182
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the Evaluation Metrics of Automated Program Repair
    Qi, Yuhua
    Liu, Wenhong
    Zhang, Weixiang
    Yang, Deheng
    2017 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (DSA 2017), 2017, : 168 - 168
  • [42] Automated Approaches for Program Verification and Repair
    Hallahan, William T.
    ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, 2022,
  • [43] Evaluating Distance Measures for Program Repair
    Koutcheme, Charles
    Sarsa, Sami
    Leinonen, Juho
    Haaranen, Lassi
    Hellas, Arto
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 ACM CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH V.1, ICER 2023 V1, 2023, : 495 - 507
  • [44] Automated techniques and tools for program analysis : Survey
    Ashish, Kulkarni A.
    Aghav, Jagannath
    2013 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2013,
  • [45] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Problem Solving Techniques and Tools in Programming
    Taheri, Seyyed Meisam
    Sasaki, Minoru
    Ngetha, Harrison Thuku
    2015 SCIENCE AND INFORMATION CONFERENCE (SAI), 2015, : 928 - 932
  • [46] On the Evaluation of Automatic Program Repair Techniques and Tools
    Khalilian, Alireza
    Baraani-Dastjerdi, Ahmad
    Zamani, Bahman
    2016 24TH IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICEE), 2016, : 61 - 66
  • [47] Evaluating Automatic Program Repair Capabilities to Repair API Misuses
    Kechagia, Maria
    Mechtaev, Sergey
    Sarro, Federica
    Harman, Mark
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2021, 48 (07) : 2658 - 2679
  • [48] Incremental Repair Feedback on Automated Assessment of Programming Assignments
    Paiva, Jose Carlos
    Leal, Jose Paulo
    Figueira, Alvaro
    ELECTRONICS, 2025, 14 (04):
  • [49] Poster: Automated Program Repair with Canonical Constraints
    Hill, Andrew
    Pasareanu, Corina S.
    Stolee, Kathryn T.
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 IEEE/ACM 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - COMPANION (ICSE-COMPANION, 2018, : 339 - 341