Codeflaws: A Programming Competition Benchmark for Evaluating Automated Program Repair Tools

被引:92
|
作者
Tan, Shin Hwei [1 ]
Yi, Jooyong [2 ]
Yulis [1 ]
Mechtaev, Sergey [1 ]
Roychoudhury, Abhik [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Innopolis Univ, Innopolis, Russia
关键词
automated program repair; defect classes; empirical evaluation; benchmark;
D O I
10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.76
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Several automated program repair techniques have been proposed to reduce the time and effort spent in bug-fixing. While these repair tools are designed to be generic such that they could address many software faults, different repair tools may fix certain types of faults more effectively than other tools. Therefore, it is important to compare more objectively the effectiveness of different repair tools on various fault types. However, existing benchmarks on automated program repairs do not allow thorough investigation of the relationship between fault types and the effectiveness of repair tools. We present Codeflaws, a set of 3902 defects from 7436 programs automatically classified across 39 defect classes (we refer to different types of fault as defect classes derived from the syntactic differences between a buggy program and a patched program).
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 182
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating Automated Program Repair Techniques using Introductory Programming Course Datasets
    Nakamura, Tsukasa
    Kondo, Masanari
    Kamei, Yasutaka
    Ubayashi, Naoyasu
    2022 IEEE 46TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2022), 2022, : 569 - 574
  • [2] Automated Program Repair for Introductory Programming Assignments
    Wan, Han
    Luo, Hongzhen
    Li, Mengying
    Luo, Xiaoyan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 17 : 1745 - 1760
  • [3] Automated Clustering and Program Repair for Introductory Programming Assignments
    Gulwani, Sumit
    Radicek, Ivan
    Zuleger, Florian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, PLDI 2018, 2018, : 465 - 480
  • [4] Applying Automated Program Repair to Dataflow Programming Languages
    Huang, Yu
    Ahmad, Hammad
    Forrest, Stephanie
    Weimer, Westley
    2021 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GENETIC IMPROVEMENT (GI 2021), 2021, : 21 - 22
  • [5] Automated Clustering and Program Repair for Introductory Programming Assignments
    Gulwani, Sumit
    Radicek, Ivan
    Zuleger, Florian
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2018, 53 (04) : 465 - 480
  • [6] Evaluating the Strategies of Statement Selection in Automated Program Repair
    Yang, Deheng
    Qi, Yuhua
    Mao, Xiaoguang
    SOFTWARE ANALYSIS, TESTING, AND EVOLUTION, SATE 2018, 2018, 11293 : 33 - 48
  • [7] Evaluating Automated Program Repair Using Characteristics of Defects
    Yokoyama, Haruki
    Higo, Yoshiki
    Kusumoto, Shinji
    2017 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IN PRACTICE (IWESEP), 2017, : 47 - 52
  • [8] Automated program repair using genetic programming and model checking
    Zahra Zojaji
    Behrouz Tork Ladani
    Alireza Khalilian
    Applied Intelligence, 2016, 45 : 1066 - 1088
  • [9] Automated program repair using genetic programming and model checking
    Zojaji, Zahra
    Ladani, Behrouz Tork
    Khalilian, Alireza
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 45 (04) : 1066 - 1088
  • [10] Training Language Models for Programming Feedback Using Automated Repair Tools
    Koutcheme, Charles
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2023, 2023, 13916 : 830 - 835